All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with these statements and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statements might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
In this fast, growing, competitive world every company wants their work to be unique and best from others. In this race to achieve success companies try implementing different methods, changing strategies in order to achieve a significant outcome. The prompt recommends that companies should not consider outside consultants and spend time listening to their employees itself. In my opinion, I strongly disagree with this suggestion, seeking an outside help can result in varying outcomes for three reasons.
To begin, sometimes coming from different countries, cultural backgrounds having a different approach towards the same issues can result in increasing the efficiency of the company. Consultants can bring a fresh, new perspective for the companies well being and success that the employees might not have expertise in the market analysis. For instance, an employee is hired because of his knowledge and expertise in a particular department while not having the expertise in the company’s operation, moreover employees are more concerned towards the job assigned to them rather than thinking for the company’s marketing or operational section. Employees are more bound in completing their daily targets and benefiting the company in their ways. The above example illustrates that a much creative and ingenious approach provided by outside minds that is the consultants can bring many modifications in surpassing the success of other companies.
Further, considering the burden work that each employee faces in todays job is quite higher which constraints them to look after their work. On the top of this if an employee is expected to not only complete their tasks on time but also help the company in strategical decisions this seems very tiring. Thus, hiring a consultant play a crucial role in dividing the work of the employees. For instance, an employee works diligently from morning to evening, and is totally engrossed in achieving his or her targets above this a company adds their schedule with additional work this may cause in an increase work load and stress hence, affecting the health of an employee because of which he or she might change their job resulting in an increase in the number of employees leaving which would in return affect the efficiency of the compny. The above example demonstrates that the requirement of consultants to help divide the company’s work is necessary.
Lastly, its important to consider that a consultant will be more dispassionate in taking decisions. He or she will be beneficial for the com[any as they don’t belong to it and hence are paid to suggest policies which is in favor to everyone and not targeting any single group. For example, its human nature to think in favor of oneself and not wholly in the benefit of the company. Such employees who have a partisan approach are often the reason for the deteriorating company’s reputation in the outside market. Hence the example illustrates that the success and reputation of the company is well in hands of someone handling it evenhandedly.
Of course, some argue that employees whose been working for years in the company have better understanding and are more familiar with the company’s past records. However, isn’t this the reason why few companies look quite ordinary because of following the same old approach for years. Companies who spend in hiring consultants have an edge towards their competitors in the outside market.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-15 | Aishwarya01 | 54 | view |
| 2023-09-30 | Isolus | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-23 | bacec | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-18 | Adesina Boluwatito | 83 | view |
| 2023-09-09 | Theophilus Ebuka Odoh | 50 | view |
- Some students prefer to enroll in easier classes so they can earn a higher grade Other students opt for challenging courses even though they might receive a poorer grade Which type of class do you prefer Use specific reasons and examples to support your e 52
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary Write a response in which you discuss 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 141, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: ']' seems to be missing
...He or she will be beneficial for the com[any as they don’t belong to it and hence...
^
Line 8, column 514, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...any’s reputation in the outside market. Hence the example illustrates that the succes...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, lastly, look, may, moreover, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, of course, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 80.0 58.6224719101 136% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2918.0 2235.4752809 131% => OK
No of words: 554.0 442.535393258 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26714801444 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.85151570047 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84603180591 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 268.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483754512635 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 890.1 704.065955056 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.920924961 60.3974514979 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.636363636 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1818181818 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09090909091 5.21951772744 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.384611022746 0.243740707755 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125439801044 0.0831039109588 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0787798418862 0.0758088955206 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23632278901 0.150359130593 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373017304878 0.0667264976115 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 14.1392134831 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 100.480337079 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 141, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: ']' seems to be missing
...He or she will be beneficial for the com[any as they don’t belong to it and hence...
^
Line 8, column 514, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...any’s reputation in the outside market. Hence the example illustrates that the succes...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, lastly, look, may, moreover, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, of course, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 80.0 58.6224719101 136% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2918.0 2235.4752809 131% => OK
No of words: 554.0 442.535393258 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26714801444 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.85151570047 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84603180591 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 268.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483754512635 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 890.1 704.065955056 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.920924961 60.3974514979 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.636363636 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1818181818 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09090909091 5.21951772744 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.384611022746 0.243740707755 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125439801044 0.0831039109588 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0787798418862 0.0758088955206 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23632278901 0.150359130593 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373017304878 0.0667264976115 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 14.1392134831 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 100.480337079 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.