Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? For the future career success, is relating well to other people more important than studying hard at school?

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? For the future career success, is relating well to other people more important than studying hard at school?

In modern society, in the wake of intense competition in work, more and more people pursue for success which paves a way for a better life, but what is the key determinant of success has puzzled them for a long time. Some people believe that relating well to other people play a more vital role in work. As far as I am concerned, studying hard at school is no less important than the good interpersonal relationship. I will elaborate this point in the following paragraphs.

On the one hand, studying hard can equip you with fundamental knowledge while making a live in society. What is known to us all is that having a good command of theorical knowledge can pave a way to improve practical skills in work, and if someone is industrious during the school time, it is more possible for he to be accessible to a good job. What’s more, in the fast-changing society, an excellent ability to studying can indicate that the person can keep pace with the world. A good example in this point is the achievement of astronomy all cross the world all derive from the hard-working scientists who have a solid foundation of related subjects during their school life. The precise calculation and models illustrate their basic skills in physics, math, etc. And if any theorical mistakes appear during the work, the final consequence can’t imagine.

On the other hand, just because society attaches great importance to studying hard, it doesn’t mean relating well to others is good for nothing. In many occasions, having a knowledge of interpersonal skills will benefit you a lot. It is imperative to build a personal relationship network after stepping into the society, especially for business people on the grounds that the information gotten from the network is always crucial in the trade. Moreover, the extraordinary interpersonal relationship also makes it easier for you to make new friends and find cooperation in work. For instance, imagine such scene that you are owing a big company, if you lack the ability to building a relationship with your employees and your partners in business, it will be difficult for you to listen to their inner voices and grasp the vital opportunities provided by them.

From what has been discussed above, we can easily draw a conclusion that studying hard at school and being related to others are the same important to take into consideration while pursuing success in a career. The upside of them all can be conducive to you forever.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-07-07 tjehdaud12 68 view
2019-02-11 quanjun 90 view
2019-02-11 quanjun 76 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user quanjun :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, well, while, for instance, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2070.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 420.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92857142857 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86164724299 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52619047619 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 648.9 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.0486576402 48.9658058833 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.764705882 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7058823529 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.29411764706 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340339737407 0.236089414692 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102150068658 0.076458572812 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.079069370882 0.0737576698707 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222258774688 0.150856017488 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0829421012821 0.0645574589148 128% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.