Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Getting advice from friends who are older than you is more valuable than getting advice from friends your same age.
Modern life is quite complicated, and people will seek advice from others from time to time. In my opinion, older friends can give more valuable advice than peers.
First, older people have better judgments. With more years lived, they are likely to have faced many different situations. These experiences grow with age, which means younger people might have never thoroughly thought about them. For example, when people need to decide which university to attend, older friends might help them look at more pragmatic perspectives, such as tuition fees or employment opportunities after graduation. However, younger friends might overlook many of these factors, resulting in regrettable consequences. Imagine taking the advice from peers and going to a university with a good ranking only to realize that its tuition would take decades to repay. Consulting advice from older friends who are more experienced in life can help people avoid troubles like this.
Second, older friends are good at communicating ideas, making their suggestions easily understandable. Everyone socializes. And as people grow old, they will inevitably become more skilled at socializing with others. To be more specific, when spending more time interacting with others, people will become more sophisticated at communicating ideas. Therefore, older people can convey ideas to others more effectively than younger people. And this can be important when offering sensitive advice. For example, when telling others what they have done wrong, many people will immediately become defensive even though they sometimes know they are wrong. Compared to younger friends, older people are more likely to be aware of this resistance and would protect the listener’s feelings by picking insensitive words or less blunt language. And when the listener does not feel offended, they are more willing to listen to other people’s advice.
In conclusion, older friends can make more pragmatic suggestions and communicate them more effectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-02 | neilyuan | 66 | view |
| 2022-06-02 | neilyuan | 76 | view |
| 2022-01-10 | lutzuming | 70 | view |
| 2020-05-06 | bertwang24 | 70 | view |
| 2018-12-05 | jiaoj27@hotmail.com | 60 | view |
- If you need to take a course which professor s course would you like to take 1 a professor who was voted the most popular 2 a professor who has just won an award for an outstanding research 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should make it possible for all children to attend preschool early childhood education programs for example for three year old children at no cost to the children s families 90
- Which one of the following qualities do you think is the most important for determining whether a friendship between two people will last a long time Why They always help each other in a crisis or when something goes wrong They have similar interests and 87
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Getting advice from friends who are older than you is more valuable than getting advice from friends your same age 66
- Some people think classic movies or tv shows have greater value while others think new movies are more enjoyable Which one do you agree And why 64
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...rs lived, they are likely to have faced many different situations. These experiences grow with...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, second, so, therefore, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1708.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 306.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58169934641 4.8611393121 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74751683041 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575163398693 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.6519855777 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8888888889 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223167769731 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0803416037261 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0749901367935 0.0737576698707 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177109476688 0.150856017488 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0784243294894 0.0645574589148 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 10.9000537634 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.