Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The government should spend more money on improving access to the internet than public transportation.
Government has a critical role in making decision for spend the country's budget in a way helping the improvement of the country conditions. Investing the budget on improving the internet access or public transportation are more controvertional in these days. While some citizens believe that spending money on Internet access is more important in this technological period, I personally opt for improving of pubich transportation. The ensuing paragraphs explain my reasons to this position.
First and foremost, investing money to have an updated public transportation system can lead to reduction of airpolution and consequently garantee the people health condition. To be specific, old and pollutant cars, bus and other transporting facilities release a tremendous amount of carbon dioxide in to the air which could cause many of respratory problems. Therefor, government should put money on replacing old transportation system by new or electric version.
Second, the issue of trafic specially in big and crowded cities could be solved by alocating govermental budget on public transportation. Trafic is a anoying part of city life which not only have negative influence on the health of people but also wast a significant amount of people's time. Put it in other words, people spend a lot of time in the crowded and noisy trafic which could make them angry and tired and as a result reduce their mental health moreover, they lose the valueable times of their life in the trafic. So, if a government is concern about the quality of its citizens lives, they must put a significant money to improve and spread the public transportation system. If people know that they have easy access to modern and fast public transportation system, they will defietely prefer to use it inestead of using their personal cars.
In conclusion, government always try to invest govermental money in a way that increase their citizens satisfactory. Having access to internet and improving public transportation are two ways to met the citizens requirements. In my opinion, among these two opts, public transportation has the greater priority. This is because of its influence in having clean air and reduction of traffic.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 149, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...get on public transportation. Trafic is a anoying part of city life which not onl...
^
Line 3, column 610, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'significant money'.
Suggestion: significant money
...ty of its citizens lives, they must put a significant money to improve and spread the public transp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, moreover, second, so, while, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.0752688172 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1857.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 352.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27556818182 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09393521442 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534090909091 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.583208851 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0625 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 5.45110844103 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216200221657 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.07943378753 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0740580260686 0.0737576698707 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142879458387 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0751723598934 0.0645574589148 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.