If you want to recommend a way to reduce living expenses for your friend, which of the following will you choose? Why?
1. Find a roommate to share a room
2. Do not buy the latest mobile phone, Buy new technological devices less frequently
3. Buy cheap foods and cook home (do not often eat outside)
If you want to recommend a way to reduce living expenses for your friend, which of the following will you choose? Why?
1. Find a roommate to share a room
2. Do not buy the latest mobile phone, Buy new technological devices less frequently
3. Buy cheap foods and cook home (do not often eat outside)
Today due to the economy pressures, people deal with this think that how reduce and manage their expenses. People follow different strategies to reduce or eliminate some expenses. Some people avoid buying updated technological devices and other people prefer to cook home with cheap material to control their expenses. However, in my opinion find a person to share living place may help people to decrease their living expenses. The ensuing paragraphs explain my reasons for this notion.
First of all, sharing room with a roommate would lead to reduce the living pay and consequently save more money. Put it in other words, in my country, the money that is paid for renting a room or flat consist a half of people revenue. Thus, by having a roommate people could share the house renting money and in this way they might reduce their expenses. As an illustration, when I started my first job as an engineer in a town far from my hometown, I rented a small flat near my work place and I had to pay a noticeable proportion of my salary for it. I worked hard every day but at the end of the month I hadn’t save any money. So, I decided to share my flat to one of my collueges. In this fashion, I could save half of the money which I had paid for the living place. That’s way I believe in this way.
Second, having a roommate make an opportunity to have and use the facilities that you cannot afford them so it helps to manage and reduce your expenses. An example can drive this notion home. If our roommate has an oven, which we cannot afford, we can use it without put money to buy our own oven. Therefore, living with a roommate may remove people’s need to afford some living facilities.
In summary, people could control and reduce their expenses via sharing their room with a roommate. Thus, if a friend of mine need an advice to reduce his/her living expenses, I will suggest finding a roommate to share his/her house. This is because, not only he could share the cost of room, but also could save more money by using some his roommate’s staff that he hasn’t.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-16 | ShayesteTR | 70 | view |
| 2022-08-16 | ShayesteTR | 70 | view |
| 2021-11-28 | zmz | 73 | view |
| 2020-12-31 | bijan54 | 70 | view |
| 2020-07-26 | Mostafalp | 73 | view |
- TPO 30 80
- TPO 32 81
- Imagine that you plan to donate money to charity to help people in need. If you could give money to only one type of charitable organization, which one of the following would you choose and why?An organization that provides food and housing to people in n 65
- TPO 46 _Task1 80
- TPO 24-INTEGRATED WRITING ESSAY 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 130, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'advice'.
Suggestion: advice
...oommate. Thus, if a friend of mine need an advice to reduce his/her living expenses, I wi...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, thus, in summary, first of all, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 15.1003584229 13% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1968.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 431.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56612529002 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51468734341 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480278422274 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 621.9 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5480226395 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.5652173913 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7391304348 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.82608695652 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.53405017921 176% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329969368233 0.236089414692 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103854104041 0.076458572812 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124130584356 0.0737576698707 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221509600932 0.150856017488 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.159583287423 0.0645574589148 247% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 10.9000537634 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.