Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Participating and winning medals in Olympic Games is the final goal for almost all the athletes and watching nation\'s teams gain good results in the Olympic Games is the most exciting and proud moment for all citizens. There is no doubt that with more funds, teams will be more likely to achieve better grades in international competitions, and I completely agree that the government should invest more on athletes. But we should not undermine the importance of arts at the same time.
To start with, funding in athletes can be beneficial to the country image. Establishing an outstanding sports team is extremely costly, and the money can be spent in various ways to improve the team condition. For instance, buying high-quality training facilities can protect athletics from being injured and increase the training efficiency. Hence, the fund from the government can increase the possibilities for the team to gain gold medals in international competitions, which not only the team can bring glory to the country and people, the international image of the national can also be largely lifted.
On top of that, seeing the nation\'s team gain good results in international competitions can motivate more people to play sports and do exercises, which can increase the citizens\' health level. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. In my primary school age, I hated doing sports and I always got sick, but things changed after I became a huge fan of Chinese swimming team after watching the 2008 Olympic Games. Since then, I started to go swimming every weekend until now. Although I did not become as good as them, I become much healthier and seldom get sick.
I cannot deny that arts can also represent the image of a country and investing on arts can improve citizens\' aesthetic level. However, people normally pay less attention on arts than sports, and artists have more ways to gather funds, like through donations from art organizations. Therefore, it is more crucial to invest more in athletes.
Consequently, I am of the opinion that governments should invest more in support of athletes. This is because the enhancement of sports teams can bring glory to the country, and more citizens will be encouraged to participate in exercising and promote the overall health level.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-21 | Take | 70 | view |
| 2023-05-20 | slliland | 90 | view |
| 2023-05-06 | waliwaliwa | 85 | view |
| 2023-02-12 | redark777 | 75 | view |
| 2023-02-11 | Ruuluu9073 | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 45
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs Many pterosaurs were very large some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters Paleontologists have long wondered whether large pterosaurs were capabl 80
- The Salton Sea in California is actually a salty inland lake The level of salt in the lake s water what scientists call its salinity has been increasing steadily for years because the lake s water is evaporating faster than it is being replaced by rainfal 88
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because modern life is very complex it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, so, then, therefore, for instance, no doubt, to start with, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1928.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 380.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07368421053 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81519423123 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523684210526 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 592.2 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.1821189487 48.9658058833 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.411764706 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3529411765 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186566434045 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623430861437 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504702337922 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108714912131 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396072085366 0.0645574589148 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.