Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments and private companies should share their scientific discoveries with the rest of the world.
To many people, in the first glance, share scientific attainment seems compulsory for governments and private companies that it will provide highly promotion for others too. but why so many governments and privet companies don't share their significant scientific achievements? They might have rational reasons, after a sober consideration, I am the same of opinion with them, because there are some salient reasons; the competitive atmosphere it cause, the innovative invent people could benefit and the reputation Governments and private companies could acquire.
to begin with, not sharing their own prominent scientific discoveries provides competition atmosphere among rival company or governments. It leads them to make much more effort to gain better discoveries than others. in so many cases the new innovation will of course entail of hard working at which if they get scientific invention easily from other company, they would not able to improve their services or products in a better manner because this novelty designs compatible with their own organization and maybe receiver organs could not handle it rightly or it does not fit in their system. for instance the methods being exerted in the developed country to improve their economic condition will not work for developing ones even though it is a quit new beneficial and scientific avenue which advise recently, even if they apprise that, due to differentiate between whole systems it does not beneficial for other governments and they must try to discover a monolithic plan for their own organization.
what's more, not only by not revealing scientific discoveries with rest of the world, they could be pioneer in specific major but also it could be so lucrative for them and it leads to other merits such as independency and self confidence. Having exclusive point is a great advantages that eschew organization to divulge their major discoveries. by being cognizant of reputation for something unique, it will raise their independency and self confidence to obsess more and more and reliance of thire own ability not any one else. as a point in case, The APPLE company is a very innovative company with high caliber of products that engrosses people more and more by introducing new products. This company maintains their novelty secret and could benefit of thier ability to wonder customers. Besides other rival company like SAMSUNG have qualified products that now are comparing with APPLE's one, regardless of offering a reasonable amount of money for their products , since SMSUNG company has their own policy to invent new methods and then keep it secret to making more profit and fame and finally customers whom benefit the most of the beauty of this achievement.
in conclusion, despite the fact that those who hold opposite of view urge that sharing scientific discoveries are the better way that human could rapidly assist each other to raise living condition on the earth, yet I think there might have been caused so many abuse. Hence by being considered the forgance of advantages I have discussed not to provide opportunity of competence to suggest better things but to become pioneer for their effort and independency.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-02 | Pakshid | 80 | view |
| 2019-10-14 | AugustRush | 85 | view |
| 2019-10-14 | AugustRush | 76 | view |
| 2019-06-18 | SERDARKOCAK | 66 | view |
| 2018-12-07 | darbast | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 104, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ent seems compulsory for governments and private companies that it will provide h...
^^
Line 2, column 178, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...rovide highly promotion for others too. but why so many governments and privet comp...
^^^
Line 2, column 227, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...o many governments and privet companies dont share their significant scientific achi...
^^^^
Line 2, column 450, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'causes'?
Suggestion: causes
... reasons; the competitive atmosphere it cause, the innovative invent people could ben...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...s and private companies could acquire. to begin with, not sharing their own promi...
^^
Line 3, column 217, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...to gain better discoveries than others. in so many cases the new innovation will o...
^^
Line 3, column 238, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'innovation'.
Suggestion: innovation
...eries than others. in so many cases the new innovation will of course entail of hard working a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 300, Rule ID: IF_IS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
... course entail of hard working at which if they get scientific invention easily fr...
^^
Line 3, column 595, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...tly or it does not fit in their system. for instance the methods being exerted in t...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Whats
...c plan for their own organization. whats more, not only by not revealing scienti...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
...c plan for their own organization. whats more, not only by not revealing scienti...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 346, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: By
...ion to divulge their major discoveries. by being cognizant of reputation for somet...
^^
Line 6, column 516, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anyone'?
Suggestion: anyone
...e and reliance of thire own ability not any one else. as a point in case, The APPLE com...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 530, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: As
... of thire own ability not any one else. as a point in case, The APPLE company is a...
^^
Line 6, column 967, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nable amount of money for their products , since SMSUNG company has their own poli...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...st of the beauty of this achievement. in conclusion, despite the fact that those...
^^
Line 7, column 257, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun abuse seems to be countable; consider using: 'many abuses'.
Suggestion: many abuses
...I think there might have been caused so many abuse. Hence by being considered the forgance...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 269, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...e might have been caused so many abuse. Hence by being considered the forgance of adv...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 328, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...idered the forgance of advantages I have discussed not to provide opportunity of ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, hence, if, may, so, then, for instance, i think, in conclusion, of course, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 13.8261648746 181% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2697.0 1977.66487455 136% => OK
No of words: 515.0 407.700716846 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23689320388 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.763781212 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77671656611 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 269.0 212.727598566 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522330097087 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 858.6 618.680645161 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 20.1344086022 169% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 105.443697457 48.9658058833 215% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 179.8 100.406767564 179% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.3333333333 20.6045352989 167% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.86666666667 5.45110844103 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 19.0 5.5376344086 343% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247000840785 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0976798118441 0.076458572812 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637923747323 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15827333183 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0590401654649 0.0645574589148 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.4 11.7677419355 173% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.51 58.1214874552 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.7 10.1575268817 174% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 86.8835125448 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.0537634409 155% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.247311828 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.