Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Human activity is making the earth a worse place to live. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
No one can deny that human activity has both advantages and disadvantages on earth. If I had to agree or disagree on the statement, I would agree on the following statement. I firmly believe that humun activity is harming our planet earth, and I would demonstrate the reasons in subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, Today, majority of the machines operated by humuns are in some way harming our environment. Cars, Trucks and other vehicles are efficient tools for transportation but on the other hand, they are major source of carbon dioxide and other obnoxious gases in the environment. These gases makes the breathing process difficult for humuns and other living creatures. My opinion on this matter is profundly influenced by my own personal experience. Few years ago, our family shifted to Delhi, my father who is an asthma patient started facing difficulties in breathing. Doctor advised us to leave Delhi because of its poor air quality, and settle to a place with less pollution. If there would have been less pollution in Delhi, We would have remained there without any problems.
Secondly, With time, population of humuns is increasing gradually and so is the industrialization. The increased industrialization is causing more deforestation. Today, a lots of efforts and money is invested in augmenting the infrastructure, but it is coming at the cost of forests. We humuns are relentlessly destroying forests for our own benefit. Forest is habitat for various animals and when we cut them we are snatching their homes, which is the cause for extinction of several species. For example, last year in Mumbai, high court approved to cut down 2000 tress for an ongoing metro project. As a result, several leopards residing in those areas started coming to roads in search of prey.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that humun activity is harming our planet. This is because we humuns are reponsible for extinction of several species, and polluting our air. We humuns are harming ourselves, and other living beings in several ways, making this planet a difficult place to live.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 300, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'make'.
Suggestion: make
...s gases in the environment. These gases makes the breathing process difficult for hum...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 697, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had been'?
Suggestion: had been
...o a place with less pollution. If there would have been less pollution in Delhi, We would have ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 170, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a lot' or simply 'lots'?
Suggestion: a lot; lots
...n is causing more deforestation. Today, a lots of efforts and money is invested in aug...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1753.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 343.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11078717201 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94657440803 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586005830904 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.4775376499 48.9658058833 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.65 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.15 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128716073755 0.236089414692 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0423761926661 0.076458572812 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651307310033 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101051675482 0.150856017488 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0971889946871 0.0645574589148 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.