Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Improving transportation is the best way for governments to promote economic growth. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Improving transportation is the best way for governments to promote economic growth. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Actually, on one hand some people agree that government has to promote the economic growth by improving transportation. On the other hand, others are disagree about this idea and they don't believe that government has to spend funds to improve transportation. I strongly agree that improve transportation is one of the most important factor due to many reasons compelling in the next paragraphs.

First and foremost, transportation is essential aspect in individual's lives all around the globe. Increasing the percentage of population impact people's life style in negatively way. Additionally, majority of people moving from rural areas to the citites. This has influence people's life. For instance, In United State more than seventy percent of employees using transportation every day to reach their jobs. Moreover, no one could deny this life could be much difficult without using technology to improve transportation. Similarly, countries can raise their economical level by build different kind of train railways and bus stations as well.

Second, creating vast of transportation will allow people to avoid traffic and diminish the ratio of car accidents. For example, India made one of the largest transportation's projects to allow people using the bus and train. As a result the ratio of death according to cars collision decreased to the half. Furthermore, this ration

In closing, I strongly agree that government should work on acheiving the easiest and convenient ways of transportation. people nowadays rely on buses to ride them their jobs for doing their tasks.

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 151, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'disagreed'.
Suggestion: disagreed
...ortation. On the other hand, others are disagree about this idea and they dont believe t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 185, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...s are disagree about this idea and they dont believe that government has to spend fu...
^^^^
Line 5, column 40, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Second, creating vast of transportation will allow people to avoid traffic and d...
^^
Line 5, column 227, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...o allow people using the bus and train. As a result the ratio of death according t...
^^
Line 5, column 333, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed to the half. Furthermore, this ration In closing, I strongly agree that govern...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 122, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
... and convenient ways of transportation. people nowadays rely on buses to ride them the...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, similarly, so, well, as to, for example, for instance, kind of, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 15.1003584229 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 43.0788530466 37% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1337.0 1977.66487455 68% => OK
No of words: 246.0 407.700716846 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43495934959 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.48103885553 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0843909468 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 212.727598566 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.638211382114 0.524837075471 122% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 618.680645161 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.5780699543 48.9658058833 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.1333333333 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.73333333333 5.45110844103 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212325580729 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063508992631 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573715849376 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12452182238 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0588358315981 0.0645574589148 91% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.