Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to have friends who are intelligent than to have friends who have a good sense of humor.
By and large, frienships are vital relations in everybody's life. It is owing to the fact that people spend most of their time with their friends and they exeprience a wide range of events whether good or bad with them. A question can be raised in this regard that is what features are important in frienships. One reoccurring idea states friends who are very clever are superior to ones who have a good sense of humor. I concur with the statment and in the ensuing lines, I will delve into two reasons to substantiate my point.
The first reason is that you benefit more from intelligent friends. There are hard moments in people's lives when their need sombody to be with them and help to cope with challenging situations. Smart friends can truely help and come with conducive solutions to coushin the sad occurances. My dad experience is the compelling example of this. When my dad was in trouble with his financial issues, he decided to sell his car to pay loans. Some of his friends, whom he usually hanged out with them and had fun, said that there was nothing to do with these problems and it was a part of everybody's life. On the contrary, when my dad told his story to his clever boss who also was friend with him, he proposed an amazing to way to get rid of this killing sitiuation and my dad was no longer need to sell his beloved car.
Secondly, having smart friends, eventually, leads to be like them. There is a popular remark that says: "If you want to be a guy who is successful in his business, you should make prosprous friends." It says that after people intercat with their friends, they get similar to them and influence each other. So, smart friends around people for a long time, cause they treat like an intelligen individual who is probably more successful in demanding lives. On the contrary, friends who always make jokes, cause you to take life less serious and handle events in a undetermined manner.
In summary, all aforementioned reasons bring us to conclude that smar friends are prefarable as they help people in rigorous situations and make them to be an intelligent one. Hence, lets hope peopele consider this in their friendships.
- People in communities can make decisions that protect and improve the natural environment Which one of the following three actions is most useful for people to do if they want to help the environment in their local community Explain why 1 Plant trees and 77
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to have friends who are intelligent than to have friends who have a good sense of humor. 76
- At work or school, you might encounter a problem that requires creativity -for example, you are given a task to complete that is very different from other tasks you do. In work or school situation that requires you to think creatively, would you prefer to 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important to read or watch the news presented by people whose views are similar to your own than by people whose views are different from yours. 76
- TPO-02 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 567, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a undetermined manner" with adverb for "undetermined"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ake life less serious and handle events in a undetermined manner. In summary, all aforementioned reas...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 570, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... life less serious and handle events in a undetermined manner. In summary, all...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, if, second, secondly, so, in summary, by and large, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1802.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 385.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68051948052 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56563166605 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553246753247 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6001715955 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.111111111 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3888888889 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245355272628 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0729833295482 0.076458572812 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0790593258268 0.0737576698707 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148774561688 0.150856017488 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0737385518772 0.0645574589148 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.