Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In today's world, with the development of technology, people face various subjects of knowledge. Some people believe that it is better to have information on multiple academic subjects. I, personally, hold the opposite position and believe that people who choose one particular subject are more successful. In the following paragraphs, I explain my reasons to clarify my viewpoint.
To begin with, focusing on a single field for studying will lead people to find their desired job more convenient. One who concentrates on a major subject would be an expert on it due to the fact that is familiar with all aspects of the field. Besides, companies are more interested to hire who has a high level of knowledge in his or her field of study. For example, when I was a sophomore, met with one of my close friends, Ali. He liked electronic so much and endowed most of his time to study related courses to engineering and electronic devices. He just concentrated on the main subtopic in electronics and after a few years, he became an adept expert on it. After his graduation, a company, which work was similar to Ali's skill and Ali loved it, requested to employ him. Had he not focused on his substantial field, he would have not been able to get his favorite job without any trouble.
Secondly, when students study various topics simultaneously, may fall in distraction and get bored with the educational process. Academic learning might be so confusing for who has no bright mindset and wants to get information about broad subjects. The mentioned distraction cause that the students do not occupy enthusiastically in their classes or in some severe conditions abandons studying. My own experience is a convincing example of this point. During my study in university, I felt that there are two subjects which I could not opt in my main field between them. Then, I decided to continue studying both of them, although, after a while, I felt distracted and I was being bored with my university stuff. As is clear, the specialized topic will lead students to better concentration.
To sum up, based on the aforementioned paragraphs, it is better for people to monopolize their study subject. In this way, they can be more prosperous when want to find their favorite job and it will prevent them to face distraction.
- j 3
- The passage claims that the population of birds is decreasing in the United States because of using pesticide by pointing out three reasons for support. The lecture, on the other hand, states that the mentioned theories in the passage are unconvincing and 78
- The passage claims that there are several possible theories that scientists have proposed about the reasons of the Little Ice Age by pointing out three reasons for support. The lecture, on the other hand, states that the mentioned theories are out of date 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- The passage claims that sending a human to Mars rather than Moon has faced some challenging problems by pointing out three reasons for support. The lecture, on the other hand, states that all the problems mentioned in the passage have a solution and refut 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, thus, while, for example, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1926.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 393.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90076335878 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92422545917 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554707379135 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 603.0 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.4417613627 48.9658058833 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.7142857143 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7142857143 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57142857143 5.45110844103 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141516190996 0.236089414692 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0445772181481 0.076458572812 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0342769873071 0.0737576698707 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0916883502613 0.150856017488 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442202572432 0.0645574589148 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.