Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
With the development of technology, some new ways of communication have emerged. Although some people believe that sending files by e-mail is much easier and leads group activities toward victory, I am of the opinion that making direct relation will increase the proficiency among people. In the following paragraphs, I explain my reasons to clarify my viewpoint.
To begin with, by meeting in person, people can consider all aspects of a work which should be done. When one wants to respond to a colleague's question, cannot declare the whole situation in a single e-mail. Then, maybe he recalls some fault or mistakes later, which needs to send another e-mail. However, when two people have a discussion with each other in person, every single idea or innovative notion which comes to their minds will be asserted and evaluated. My own academic experience is a compelling example of this. When I was a student at the University of Tehran, for my history course, our professor separated the students in the class into small groups which each group should give a lecture for the class. At first, we made a channel to share our ideas there. After a few days, we saw no progress in our project, which led us to hold a meeting and speak with each other in person. As is clear, talking with each other face-to-face will lead a group to catch their intention conveniently and will help them look profoundly at their subject.
Secondly, communicating via e-mail instead of contacting in-person takes more time. When the employees of a company want to discuss a topic with each other, they should send their e-mails formally, which needs time for typing drafts and some useless prescriptions just for obeying the rules. In addition, they should wait until the colleague sees the e-mail, examine it, and make a response. After that, maybe there was another question and vague matter which should be asked and all the above time-wasting circle should be traversed again. For instance, in my history project's example, when we used e-mail, just saw a little progress after a few days because we wasted a great amount of time waiting for other members to see and respond to my e-mails.
In conclusion, interacting in person with classmates or colleagues is superior to using e-mail. In this way, they not only can debate thoroughly around the subject but also can save a lot of time.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- The passage claims that increasing salt level in lake's water, which makes it hard for birds and fishes to go on living there and would transform the lake into a dead zone, would be solved the trend which is harmful to the lake's health by point 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at young age. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because modern life is very complex it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, then, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1973.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 404.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88366336634 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60532471882 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581683168317 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 603.0 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0224001646 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.842105263 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2631578947 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57894736842 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219267876268 0.236089414692 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690546004511 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448848079078 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128290002936 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0274344677792 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.