Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to make friends with intelligent people than with the people who have a good sense of humor.
Friends have always had an essential role in our lives. They have often paramount effects, especially on our behavior, in various conditions. Some people prefer to have humorous friends, while some others, including me, have a different viewpoint. I firmly believe that friendship with intelligent people is a better choice for everyone who wants to have nice friends. Not only do they understand well our conditions, but also we can learn a lot from their abilities. In what follows, I scrutinize the most outstanding reasons.
First and foremost, intelligent friends can easily perceive our emotions and our challenges. This characteristic helps them to recognize different parts of the story. Then, they analyze them without any hesitation. Needless to say, this paves the way for both of us to be more convenient during discussions about our problems. In fact, their help has a profound effect on our decisions. For instance, when I was a mechanical engineering student, I had a serious problem about proper communication skills with the teachers. Once I described my problem to one of my close friends, who was known as an intelligent student in our high school, he immediately captured my purpose. In fact, he had this ability to think deeply as soon as possible and his intelligence was the key point in this regard. He gave me invaluable advice for this problem. When I implement his solutions, I could easily handle the critical conditions in front of the teachers. Had not I chosen him as my friend, I would not be able to overcome my problem.
A furthermore significant point is that talented friends can transfer valuable information. They have special abilities due to their intelligence. Therefore, we can learn different concepts with selecting them as our friends. We spend a lot of time with each other and it creates proper opportunities to share our information about a variety of matters. The more intelligence, the more deep knowledge will be available for the person. Consequently, we can utilize them as a reliable source of information. Let's take my own personal experience as an example. I have a friend who has high IQ. He has published several masterpieces about history. Whenever we have a heated debate about ancient people, he easily explains different aspects of the way they live in the past. My intelligent friend has fantastic abilities to explore new information of history and he presents his activities to me effectively. As you can see, having an intelligent friend cause we learn a lot in different circumstances. That's why it is a better choice rather than a humorous friend.
In brief, by taking into account all the aforementioned reasons, it seems that choosing the intelligent people as close friends is a rational strategy. It helps us to evolve our abilities. Furthermore, they understand our emotions and problems effectively. Hence, it is highly recommended for everyone who wishes to have the most benefits from his or her friends during the lifetime.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 507, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...em as a reliable source of information. Lets take my own personal experience as an e...
^^^^
Line 5, column 999, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...learn a lot in different circumstances. Thats why it is a better choice rather than a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, if, so, then, therefore, well, while, for instance, in brief, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 79.0 43.0788530466 183% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2518.0 1977.66487455 127% => OK
No of words: 494.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0971659919 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71445763274 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04608992049 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522267206478 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 784.8 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 25.0 9.59856630824 260% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 34.0 20.6003584229 165% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.200346019 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.0588235294 100.406767564 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5294117647 20.6045352989 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55882352941 5.45110844103 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 28.0 11.8709677419 236% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203751751297 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.049721061422 0.076458572812 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629204305403 0.0737576698707 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139274483782 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612509488689 0.0645574589148 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.1575268817 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 86.8835125448 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.