Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is better to stop reading and listening to the news for a period of a few days or weeks.
Reading the news and listening to radio podcasts are the most important pillars of each society in today’s world. Due to the fact we live in a chaotic and fast-paced world, it is necessary for us to be aware of last-updated news, to handle our situations. While the news has benefits for us in planning our next step, its negative side can change our lives. A controversial question that is often raised regarding this issue is whether people should stop reading and listening to the news for a while or whether they should be aware of last-updated news. Some people possess the conviction that the former is more agreeable whereas others hold the exact opposite and allege that the latter is more fruitful. I am personally content that this issue is multifaceted. I think as we live in a mass world, it is crucial for us to handle and manage our lives by limiting negative news. I’d rather continue with the first approach. To substantiate my point of view, the following paragraphs represent a cursory glance at the most outstanding reasons.
The first reason coming to mind elucidating my standpoint is that some of the news has negative consequences on our minds and soul. For example, the news of wars and captivity, due to the outbreaks of violence on them, are not appropriate for us. We have to reduce the time we spend watching the news on Tv or social media. It can help us to feel less tension and stress. Consider my personal experience to make this point more clear. During the last two years, there was a protest in my country and people felt hate and anger against the government’s strategies. All the news that we heard was dysfunction and dread. I have woken up with a panic attack and I have push my jaw on them at night in my sleep. Furthermore, I went to the doctor and she told me that I had to reduce time surffing on the Internet and pursue the news.
The second rationale behind this opinion is rooted in the fact that we should know that some young people are watchers and viewers of this kind of news with negative consequences for them too. In particular, teenagers because they are emotional and they believe fake news easily, families and parents should control their watching news. Some of this news the youth's beliefs and they try to secession or erupt their feelings in inappropriate ways.
In brief, Due to the aforementioned reasons, I think people should limit their time to pursue news and go to nature to reduce their tensions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-21 | Newporteghale | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | cathylin36 | 83 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Children rely too much on the technology like computers smart phones video games for fun and entertainment Playing simpler toys or playing outside with friends would be better for children s developmen 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Drivers have to pay a fee for driving in busy city streets when there is a great amount of traffic 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to stop reading and listening to the news for a period of a few days or weeks 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 881, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ge our lives by limiting negative news. I’d rather continue with the first approa...
^
Line 2, column 67, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... mind elucidating my standpoint is that some of the news has negative consequences on our m...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 674, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...p with a panic attack and I have push my jaw on them at night in my sleep. Furthe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, regarding, second, so, whereas, while, for example, i think, in brief, in particular, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 62.0 43.0788530466 144% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2039.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 437.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66590389016 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64347128811 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503432494279 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 621.9 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6467087188 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6818181818 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8636363636 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.31818181818 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.85842293907 337% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160732518575 0.236089414692 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0474547826526 0.076458572812 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402103410649 0.0737576698707 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0914288516241 0.150856017488 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484601740062 0.0645574589148 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.