Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It's a waste of money for the government to fund space exploration. Give specific examples and details to support your answer.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It's a waste of money for the government to fund space exploration. Give specific examples and details to support your answer.

Without a shadow of a doubt, space exploration is one of the heaviest costs that governments have ever paid. It is more challenging when we realize how limited are our resources and how extend are our terrestrial needs. The controversial question which arises here is whether such explorations worth that big costs or not. There are many strong grounds for believing that space explorations have been worthwhile in multiple aspects of our lives two of which I will explore in the following paragraphs.

The most significant reason is that many useful scientific achievements and inventions are rooted in space science. Actually, if it was not for space scientists endeavor there were not any MRI machines, telecommunication devices, advanced water-purification systems, solar panels, spacesuit materials in clothing and so on. Needless to say, almost the life of all people at any level of income has been deeply influenced by these fantastic inventions. They have also contributed to the improvement of our collective life and the environmental situation of our planet. If space research is not funded, we will be deprived of many upcoming practical inventions and discoveries. For instance, solar panels which were first used at spacecraft as a power supplier is now one of our options for reaching sustainability. Providing electricity through absorbing sun radiations is a clean way of producing power. It is also an easy way to produce electricity in areas which are hard to access. For example, I born in a mountainous village that uses solar panels to produce electricity.

Another noteworthy reason is that space exploration is a context to make nations united. It used to be the field of Cold War but as time goes on more countries are collaborating in space explorations and it is a kind of inspiration for humanity to overcome any problem through synergy. Besides that, these mutual missions facilitate cross-cultural and scientific growth of man. Although conflict of interest is always a strong obstacle in way of reaching unity among nations, space exploration is the non-zero sum game which can bring all nations together. It is obvious that the more complex is the matter the more collaboration we need. For example, the International Space Station is the result of cooperation between the most conflicting countries. After a while, more countries have participated in space exploration missions.

All in all, our life is profoundly influenced by space researches, so it is necessary to fund it to get even more benefits out of it. Breathtaking inventions and findings are ahead which will be available just in case of global partnership.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-14 mheydarido07 76 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user mheydarido07 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1001, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[1]
Message: Possible grammatical error. You used a past participle without using any required verb ('be' or 'have'). Did you mean 'bore'?
Suggestion: bore
...hich are hard to access. For example, I born in a mountainous village that uses sola...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1078, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es solar panels to produce electricity. Another noteworthy reason is that space ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, first, if, so, while, for example, for instance, kind of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 33.0 15.1003584229 219% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2234.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 428.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21962616822 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18785444014 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551401869159 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 712.8 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.025454724 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.545454545 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4545454545 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.90909090909 5.45110844103 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0928943089954 0.236089414692 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0276393119799 0.076458572812 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0257590900659 0.0737576698707 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0570274350494 0.150856017488 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0101833452856 0.0645574589148 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 86.8835125448 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.