Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to work as a team than as an individual to succeed Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

It is better to work as a team than as an individual to succeed.

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

A glance at people's attitudes toward the notion of how to become successful brings to light a question that has been asked several times, namely, whether to be successful it is better to work alone or in a team. Although some people assert that working solitary, a person has a better opportunity to succeed, I, as a recently graduated university student, believe that working in a team, a person would have more chance to enhance toward victory.
The foremost reason why I am supporting this idea lies in the fact that although a person may have a great idea at the beginning the implementation segment is usually the part that most fail to deliver the work they are supposed to. For example, if a person feels his question is somehow trivial, he may consider not asking it at all; consequently, he gets despaired and he will not able to finish the task singlehandedly. Recent studies conducted by Harvard University, department of effective study, conspicuously divulged a link between failing to solve the very first a few problems a person fronting, while trying to solve a problem, and leaving the project entirely. The most significant aspect of leaving the duty is that a person who does not have anyone to hearten him would leave the task because they are afraid that they will humiliate themselves in front of others. Hence, it is important to have someone educated to encourage one to be persistent throughout the whole project and do not become hopeless.
Another subtle point that I should deem is the fact that members of a team can share the solutions crossing their minds while they face a problem, and therefore, they are able to find a solution not only quicker but also more efficiently. Not having the ability to consult with each other, they may choose a solution that may seem profitable, but in the end, turn to a total disaster or very costly solution. For instance, NASA spent a lot of money inventing a pen that can write in space, while their counterparts were simply using pencils. Ergo, members of a team must have a criticizing attitude toward each others' ideas to find loopholes faster and prevent failure in the future--since by mentioning flaws in one's proposal, a person can save the team time and money. Hence, working in a group, members will have a better likelihood of becoming successful.
Admittedly, not all group members are going to be fruitful. In fact, it is not odd to consider that in some groups only one person doing the whole job. Nonetheless, teamwork is always better since even members' presence can sometimes be encouraging for the team's mastermind to work harder.
Due to the aforementioned arguments explored in the previous statements, I personally claim that working in a team has a better chance of success, for members will not have despaired at the early stages and they can find a solution faster and more thorough.
The lake's water was too salty.

Votes
Average: 9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-07-11 arius 90 view
2021-07-11 arius 76 view
2021-04-19 Mithun Chandra Banik 85 view
2021-03-03 DmitryGrigorev 60 view
2020-12-08 Pravin s. jadhav 60 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user arius :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 713, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...he future--since by mentioning flaws in ones proposal, a person can save the team ti...
^^^^
Line 4, column 202, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'members'' or 'member's'?
Suggestion: members'; member's
...s, teamwork is always better since even members presence can sometimes be encouraging f...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, may, nonetheless, so, therefore, while, as to, for example, for instance, in fact

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2413.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 500.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.826 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72870804502 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73940942541 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 264.0 212.727598566 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 766.8 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.245963494 48.9658058833 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.941176471 100.406767564 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.4117647059 20.6045352989 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.29411764706 5.45110844103 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113813690147 0.236089414692 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0385202011977 0.076458572812 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0344741124527 0.0737576698707 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0610053299104 0.150856017488 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372593626827 0.0645574589148 58% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 11.7677419355 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 58.1214874552 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.33 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 86.8835125448 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.