Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Some people believe that working three days for a long time is better than working a few hours five days a week. However, I disagree with the above statement. In my opinion working five days a week for shorter hours is effective for below three reasons.
First of all, Working for shorter hours increases productivity and makes an individual more efficient. Shorter work hours help to maintain efficiency. For example, my office has seven hours for five days working policy. I can easily manage brainstorming work without any difficulties. As the work hours are shorter, my work is divided into small tasks and I can easily complete at least one assigned task in a day, even the most complicated ones. On the other hand, my husband works three days in a week for twelve hours. It is difficult for him to maintain the same pace the whole day. At the end of the day, he barely can work. Thus, working for a shorter period provides a better outcome.
Secondly, Working for fewer hours helps to maintain a balance between work and personal life. Fewer hours in the office provides an opportunity to focus on the health and overall development of a person. For example, my shorter office hours allow me to complete household chores along with going to the gym and dance classes. Whereas if my office had for twelve hours working policies, I would have no time to work on my health and personality. Thus, working for fewer hours helps to work healthily.
Lastly, going to five for five days a week will allow me to participate and manage office events. Office events make us feel fresh and help us to connect with co-workers. For example, In the office we have many competitions, sometimes we watch FIFA matches together. These activities help us to gel with team members which help in working together as a team. Thus, going to the office five days a week is more beneficial.
In conclusion, going to work for five days with shorter work hours helps in the development of an individual.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | maryka72 | 60 | view |
| 2023-03-07 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | kevin1105 | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | Hibahtabbaa | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | can111 | 3 | view |
- A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for their own college aged children Therefore Seatown should institute a free tuition policy for its professo 59
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they respond to the specific points made in the reading passage 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement At universities and colleges sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 32
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s field of study 79
- The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people s efficiency so that they have more leisure time Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for t 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, thus, whereas, at least, for example, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.0286738351 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1638.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 348.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70689655172 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54907571995 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 212.727598566 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.465517241379 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 513.0 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.874541216 48.9658058833 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 71.2173913043 100.406767564 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1304347826 20.6045352989 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47826086957 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.397373930967 0.236089414692 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154632172867 0.076458572812 202% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0878669490853 0.0737576698707 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.285490404251 0.150856017488 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.090364263698 0.0645574589148 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 11.7677419355 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.45 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.