Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
No one can cast a shadow of doubt on the fact that job has played an important role as an indicating factor for the society's progress. People should enjoy the work because they spend the big part of life in their jobs and it could help them to promote in their job. Not all people concur when this issue arises. To being cognizant to the logic behind those who endorse or repudiate the legitimacy of this contention, not having any biased perception, I presume that working three days for long hours in a week in more better than spending the short time in the work with five days in a week. Among a plentitude of reasons in support of this assertion, being time efficient and donate extra time for other activities could be picked out for further analysis.
To commence with, a consensus has yet to be reached; however, regarding the importance of the time in human's promoting in his/her life, based upon the statistics of different general questionnaires, people are unanimous about the conviction that people could save in their time with lower working day; moreover, there are some due time for different duties which this limitation of time stimulates people to work more efficient. To elucidate on, they attempt to finish their job on time and using all the time they have without any wasting time. A vivid example can be given to shed light on what was elaborated above. The results of a study carried out by Rice University's graduate students unveiled the fact that workers who work on some island for production oil have better performance and their managers are satisfied with their outcome. These workers should work for 2 weeks in a month and they have 2 weeks for rest.
In addition to the reason raised above; the availability of extra time for donating for other activity such as the second job could also substantiate the justifiability of the claim made at the outset of this essay. In conjunction with public belief, many people work in two jobs and they spend the extra time of the first job for another job. They could earn extra money and use them in the different situation. Furthermore, it could be a reliable job if the first job faces with the economic recession. For instance, My brother is working in a big company for 4 days in a week. He is allocated some time for painting houses and finds money.
Taking an impartial position, not to turn the blind eye on the deleterious effect of high-pressure job's hour in a single week on the people, it should be accentuated that this type could harm people in a long run and makes them exhausted. In another word, they lose their penchant because of tiredness. Nevertheless, the palatable effects of working in lower days in a week take precedence over infinitesimal disadvantageous.
Drawing upon the reasons, as far as my personal perspective on the topic is concerned, I reiterate that woking in lower days with more hours is far better than spending time in the normal job with common work's hours. It helps people not only to save their time but also earning some money.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | maryka72 | 60 | view |
| 2023-03-07 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | kevin1105 | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | Hibahtabbaa | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | can111 | 3 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. Use specific reasons and examples t 88
- Which way do you think is the best for a student to make new friends. a. joining a sports team, b. participating in community activities, c. traveling. 85
- Imagine that you plan to donate money to charity to help people in need. If you could give money to only one type of charitable organization, which one of the following would you choose and why?- An organization that provides food and housing to people i 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people today are less dependent on their parents than young people in the past 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 514, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
... three days for long hours in a week in more better than spending the short time in the wor...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 405, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...his limitation of time stimulates people to work more efficient. To elucidate on,...
^^
Line 6, column 100, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'jobs'' or 'job's'?
Suggestion: jobs'; job's
...the deleterious effect of high-pressure jobs hour in a single week on the people, i...
^^^^
Line 6, column 141, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...obs hour in a single week on the people, it should be accentuated that this type ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, second, so, for instance, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 81.0 52.1666666667 155% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2521.0 1977.66487455 127% => OK
No of words: 534.0 407.700716846 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72097378277 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80712388197 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61128540332 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 266.0 212.727598566 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498127340824 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 795.6 618.680645161 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 92.1359785792 48.9658058833 188% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.047619048 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95238095238 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309047408147 0.236089414692 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10487520908 0.076458572812 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0849659137956 0.0737576698707 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19486335313 0.150856017488 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0530787462849 0.0645574589148 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 86.8835125448 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.