Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use specific reasons and examples to suppo
Without a shadow of the doubt, having a suitable job with good condition and working play a vital role in social development and improvement. Job's condition affects on people's relationships, their activities and other things. Many people attend that have a job where you work only three days a week is more enjoyable in comparison when you work five days a week for short hours, while others assert working five fays a week with shortet hours is better. Both of the opposing arguments appear to be somewhat. However, based on my personal experience and actual observation of life I agree that working three days is better. In the ensuing lines, I delve into two reasons to substantiate my point.
The first and possibly the paramount consequential reason is that if people work only three days in a week, they will have more free days to spend with their children and family. Having fun times with family improve their health and mental condition. Also, they have more leisure time to do their favorite activities like reading books, wathching movies, and shopping. As you can see, working just for three days in a week is a good idea.
Another point springing to mind is about happiness. Recently reaserchers have proved that people who works three days in a week are happier than people who works four or five days. Based on researchers' opinion this was a complex issue that required a lot of syudies with a broad spectrum of samples. Also, a good study would take decades and finding people to take part was not easy. But finally they did it. Finding of this noteworthy study that conducted on 10000 people with different countries to avoid any bias demonstrated that happiness is related to working and people who have more free time in aweek are happier. As a result, working for three days is better.
To sum it all up, by taking all the details into consideration, it is easy to see the advantages of working three days instead of four days in a week. By doing this people have more time to spend with their families and do their activities. Furthermore, in this condition they are happy. Having satisfied people in community creates a lot of improvements in the country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | maryka72 | 60 | view |
| 2023-03-07 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | kevin1105 | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | Hibahtabbaa | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | can111 | 3 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use specific reasons and examples to suppo 70
- TPO35 In 1912 a bookseller named Wilfrid M. Voynich acquired a beautifully illustrated handwritten book (manuscript) written on vellum (vellum is a material that was used for writing before the introduction of paper). The "Voynich manuscript," a 65
- T P O-06 - Integrated Writing Task Communal online encyclopedias represent one of the latest resources to be found on the Internet. They are in many respects like traditional printed encyclopedias collections of articles on various subjects. What is speci 65
- TPO 02 integrated writing 3
- TPO 42 independent writing 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 190, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'researchers'' or 'researcher's'?
Suggestion: researchers'; researcher's
...e who works four or five days. Based on researchers opinion this was a complex issue that r...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 160, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...nstead of four days in a week. By doing this people have more time to spend with the...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, so, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1803.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 379.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75725593668 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56969328201 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519788918206 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6474170065 48.9658058833 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.8571428571 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0476190476 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 5.45110844103 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.437854527852 0.236089414692 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118694055871 0.076458572812 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138366951197 0.0737576698707 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.284667308079 0.150856017488 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11637177224 0.0645574589148 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 11.7677419355 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.03 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.