Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.
The job that we will choose is a very important part of our lives. It goes without saying that people cannot be happy if they do not enjoy their careers. In my opinion, three days of work per week has more joy for individuals for some reason which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, three days' works per week brings more free time for people. In this circumstance, people have more off days that could spend with their families, friends, and chasing their hobbies. This means that people can pursue their dreams even when they are engaging with a task. For example, my friend, Tony, used to work in a company in which he should go for five days a week to attend to his job. Additionally, his marriage went to a bad situation that he could not dedicate enough time with his wife. Consequently, he was very close to losing his marriage. Therefore, he decided to change his working field and get a new job with fewer days in a week, so, he saved his marriage and now he has a life full of joy.
Another reason is that a job with fewer days could bring extra opportunities for individuals. If a person has a career with three days per week, he or she will have the chance to take another part-time job alongside his or her main career. This means that people in situations such as this possibly have more income from their works. For instance, my cousin, Steven, works in an automobile manufactory for three days in each week. Moreover, he used to encounter a financially catastrophic situation which made him a person who was struggling with his life. So, he decided to make a change in his life and he filled some applicants for part-time jobs. Additionally, he found a job in a big supermarket as a cashier, so, now he is paying from two different employees. As a result, he overcame the financial depression he stuck in.
In sum, though some may disagree with my points, a job with three days a week brings many beneficial opportunities to people. Not only fewer workdays will provide more job offers but also it will bring more free time to individuals. All people should consider this option before accepting his job offer.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | maryka72 | 60 | view |
| 2023-03-07 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | kevin1105 | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | Hibahtabbaa | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | can111 | 3 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. Use specific reasons and examples to su 60
- TPO 30 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. 66
- tpo 31 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1767.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 388.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55412371134 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55193035745 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502577319588 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.8318861316 48.9658058833 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.1428571429 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4761904762 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47619047619 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295739644099 0.236089414692 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103345483689 0.076458572812 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0900276854405 0.0737576698707 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210094328445 0.150856017488 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.019584281721 0.0645574589148 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.11 10.9000537634 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.01 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 86.8835125448 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.