Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
There is a huge argument among improving internet access and improving public transportation in a limited budget. In different areas, the choices are totally different. So, to be more specific, I would focus to discuss the development of far villages instead of urban areas. Some people think public transportation is more important because a convenient transportation system would bring more travelers and also increase the revenue of this area, but others do not see it in the same. As far as I concerned, internet access is more vital. There are several reasons at play, as I shall discuss below.
First of all, well internet access would decrease the difference in education among cities and rural areas. The education problem is terrible in far villages because of the less of teachers. The willingness of teachers teaching there is low because of the low salaries and far from their home. Nevertheless, the far distance teaching would be a probable solution of this serious situation. Students could learn courses through the videos on the internet or even join a class in cities via live. The solution is base on good internet access, so investments of the internet should be primary.
The second reason is the medical concerns. It is hard to build a general hospital in rural areas. The recruitment of doctors is more difficult than the recruitment of teachers, so the medical resource is unbalance between urban and rural areas. There are a number of people could not get well treatment when they are sick. The internet would partially deal with the problem. patients could consult with doctors online to solve the symptom immediately. Although, patients still need to go to hospitals to get more treatments, the internet could help release patients’ pain. Improving internet access is an easier and more efficient way to solve this problem than building a hospital.
Finally, it is easier to impose policies under a good internet environment. In the past, it is hard to connect with far villages. The transcription is far and slow, and the urgent policies could be delayed. However, if the internet access is thorough, it is easy that the central government just send a document and the local governments would get the information directly. The implementation of policies would be same time.
As a conclusion, in the technology era, governments should invest on improving internet access primarily in the rural areas. And the problems of education and less medical resource would be solved temporarily.
- TPO31 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- independent essay-TPO46 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
there is a huge argument among improving inte...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 540, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...ncerned, internet access is more vital. there are several reasons at play, as I shall...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 44, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... second reason is the medical concerns. it is hard to build a general hospital in ...
^^
Line 9, column 246, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...nbalance between urban and rural areas. there are a number of people could not get we...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 376, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Patients
... would partially deal with the problem. patients could consult with doctors online to so...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 579, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Improving
...could help release patients' pain. improving internet access is an easier and more e...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 689, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... this problem than building a hospital. Finally, it is easier to impose policies...
^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...resource would be released temporarily.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, still, well, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.0286738351 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 43.0788530466 32% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.0752688172 285% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2131.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 412.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17233009709 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8774740182 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483009708738 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 654.3 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 11.0 3.08781362007 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.3268451267 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.9615384615 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8461538462 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.45110844103 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197148814242 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0563364624234 0.076458572812 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606654898224 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116811413889 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047357216101 0.0645574589148 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.