Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts.
In today’s progressive world, no one can turn a blind eye to the significant effects of understand ideas and concepts about a subject. Some are inclined toward the opinion that students need to comprise thoughts. On the other extreme of the rope, believe that learn facts about a determined topic is better for people. Although both sides take their own positions, personally speaking, I firmly believe that the first group carries more weight. In the following paragraph, I will cogently explain my reasons to justify my points of view.
As the first and paramount reason, understand ideas and concepts enables children to extend their knowledge; thus, they can think effectively about several scientific subjects. In other words, these comprehension will provide for students valuable experiences and rational approaches. Moreover will develop people’s knowledge, expand their horizons and help them effectively achieve their goals. Take my own experience as a compelling example. When I was at high school, I decided to understand ideas of the classes. In this period, I learned much about all of subjects that were showed for me. After I finished my high school, I could have the comprehension of all subjects. As a result, got enrolled in a good university. Therefore, if I hadn't understand main concepts, nor could I achieve my personal objectives.
The second reason coming to my mind to substantiate my viewpoint is that, understanding ideas and concepts the students will get excellent grades, hence they might relieve stress and increase their self-confidence. To be more specific, students will get their goal easily and quickly. For example, experimental research conducted by some cognitive scientists at a university shows that children who understand ideas and concepts of determined subject have a good job. Because they know what is their favorite topic of something and this provides a better choices of work in their lives. As a result, this people will have a great lifestyle and self satisfaction.
In conclusion, taking the above reasons into account, I strongly believe that, students who understand ideas and concepts not only opens up a whole gamut of new valuable experiences and splendid ideas for people, but it also helps them get a fine job and personal gratification.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-07 | nilav | 66 | view |
| 2023-04-18 | sonyeoso | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-09 | Rasika0511 | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-30 | MotherAstronaut | 65 | view |
| 2022-12-30 | MotherAstronaut | 65 | view |
- TPO29 Question Summarise the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage 70
- TPO26 Question Summarise the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage 70
- TPO21 Question Summarise the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage 76
- Question Summarise the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage 73
- TPO19 Question Summarise the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage 71
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 194, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this comprehension' or 'these comprehensions'?
Suggestion: this comprehension; these comprehensions
...al scientific subjects. In other words, these comprehension will provide for students valuable expe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 286, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...le experiences and rational approaches. Moreover will develop people’s knowledge, expand...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 741, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hadn't
...d in a good university. Therefore, if I hadnt understand main concepts, nor could I a...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 601, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...es of work in their lives. As a result, this people will have a great lifestyle and ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, as for, for example, in conclusion, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1946.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 368.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28804347826 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94376644277 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567934782609 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.1463034675 48.9658058833 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225881100281 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630346420876 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532983508451 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15298456662 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0180321378423 0.0645574589148 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 194, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this comprehension' or 'these comprehensions'?
Suggestion: this comprehension; these comprehensions
...al scientific subjects. In other words, these comprehension will provide for students valuable expe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 286, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...le experiences and rational approaches. Moreover will develop people’s knowledge, expand...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 741, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hadn't
...d in a good university. Therefore, if I hadnt understand main concepts, nor could I a...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 601, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...es of work in their lives. As a result, this people will have a great lifestyle and ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, as for, for example, in conclusion, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1946.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 368.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28804347826 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94376644277 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567934782609 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.1463034675 48.9658058833 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225881100281 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630346420876 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532983508451 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15298456662 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0180321378423 0.0645574589148 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.