Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
No doubt, these days learn how to be a good leader is a significant factor in the whole world, especially in big companies. Therefore, many companies start to select their manager to belong to who has academic knowledge about leadership. However, before all, managers had the only experience to be a leader, but now, they need to educated too. From my point of view, I believe that a person can learn to be a leader, base on many factors. Here, I am going to mention all the elements.
To begin, being a leader is not natural because many strategies they need to know, which only improve with studying and searching and is much better to be educated through college. As a result, it easy to recognise a person with proper strategy and politic from a person who is a leader by experience or as they said naturally. For example, some companies with old managers which claim that they are very good at being a good manager and lead employees entirely. Although they have the experience, even the wrong one, they still need to read many books to be aware of their faults and correct them.
Secondly, all people can be a leader if and only if they were worked by competent managers and learn from them. As a result, a person with different characteristics can be a good or bad leader upon the environment which he or she worked before or even university might they studied; in this case, their professors had a perfect role in making their characters. For instance, a guy working in a company with a disaster boss, definitely he will be a known organise leader in the future, maybe many employees will be under him in the future. Still, as a leader, he never can lead them to reach a satisfactory result.
To sum up, a person who wants to be a good leader should always study and read many articles or have a degree from college in this field. In addition to that, he or she should be lucky to be in a suitable environment with professional leaders to learn from them. Broadly, ethical leadership and being an acceptable leader is not naturally.
- tpo14 integration writing 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment doing things they like to do rather than doing things they should do Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment doing things they like to do rather than doing things they should do 60
- People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment doing things they like to do rather than doing things they should do 60
- TPO 39 Integrated Writing Task 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, no doubt, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1678.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 368.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5597826087 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62588876844 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505434782609 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5710143222 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.875 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4375 5.45110844103 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177166177598 0.236089414692 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722085501749 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0388116951191 0.0737576698707 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127896443257 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0178873313161 0.0645574589148 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.