Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: Many people nowadays spend too much money on their pets (dogs, cats, or other animals), although there are better uses for their money.
It is critically important for people to make good use of the money they have, and as people’s lives are generally getting better and wealthier, more and more people spend money on pets, which leads many believing people have spent too much on pets. In my opinion, however, this statement is not true because, for many people, pets bring them comfort and make them healthier, and spending money on pets, although sometimes may cost much, doesn’t necessarily mean people don’t spend money on other important things.
To begin with, it is a generally known fact that pets bring comfort to people and help release pressure. We now live in a fast-paced society where there are constant changes, and people are asked to learn and ace more skills, which is a burden to many people; pets help release those pressure and make people more healthy mentally. Certainly, these benefits outweigh the money people spend on pets. For example, my older brother was depressed and confused after graduating from college because he was unsure what he should do as a career, and graduating was a massive change for him. To give him some accompaniment, we bought him a dog, which has really helped comfort and cheered him up quickly. This example clearly demonstrates although the cost of having a pet might be high, the benefits are definitely worth the price.
Moreover, spending money on pets doesn’t mean people don’t and can’t spend money elsewhere simultaneously. There are many things that people need to spend on food, clothes, supporting family, etc. Spending money on pets is simply a way of using cash, which will not negatively affect people’s lives since nobody is going to ignore the other essentials. For example, most people in my cities have pets, and they still live like anyone else in this world. Spending money on necessities and having pets will not affect their lives differently from others. There is no point in saying there is a better use of cash elsewhere because people are using the money elsewhere and on pets at the same time.
In conclusion, people nowadays are not spending excessive money on pets because pets are worth the cost and it is not like people only spend money on pets.
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement People should take time to relax with hobbies or physical activities that are very different from what they do at work 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because our society today is just so busy and crowded we should not expect people to be polite to one another 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because our society today is just so busy and crowded we should not expect people to be polite to one another 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Many people nowadays spend too much money on their pets dogs cats or other animals although there are better uses for their money 72
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, moreover, really, so, still, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1845.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 375.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45755289307 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490666666667 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 564.3 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.1477998088 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.6045352989 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.86666666667 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.388734538563 0.236089414692 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140595633473 0.076458572812 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0827804379606 0.0737576698707 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261474989081 0.150856017488 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0702876468329 0.0645574589148 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 86.8835125448 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 10.002688172 185% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.