Do you agree or disagree the following statement? The more money a person has, the more should he or she give away to charities.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree the following statement? The more money a person has, the more should he or she give away to charities.

From my vantage point, if a person has more money he/she should give more money to charities. A wealthy person that has lots of money giving some of it to the charities will not affect his life style. moreover, it will be easy for him to give more money to charities. Sometimes, we observe that some wealthy people are not eager to give their money to charities and spend or keep all of their money for themselves. In the following paragraphs, I will explain these conspicuous reasons to elaborate my opinion.

The first aspect to point out is that, when wealthy people give their money to charities, it helps the society to become less needy. In addition, the charities can provide food, shelter and more facilities for poor people and the people in need. There are many poor people in the world that they need food, shelter and medical assistant. The rich people spend a lot of their money for unnecessary things that they can give that money to charities instead of spending it for unnecessary items. For example, when I was a student I gave some money to charities instead of buying more clothe that I did not have to have. I was happy to give to other people so they could get what they need it. it satisfied me because I was happy that other people could have what they needed.

Another noteworthy point is that, rich people become more popular by giving and can benefit in the society. if rich people help charities and build some facilities such as school, university, hospital and so on, they will be more popular among people. they can earn a better position in the society. moreover, they will be in a better position to help more charities. I think, with this believe we can see less crime in the society because many crimes such as stealing is done by needy people. when needy people can satisfy their needs, they commit less crime.

Finally, one should consider the fact that helping charities by rich people is important and it is very helpful for a better society. As a result, we can have significant changes for the better in the society.

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-07-26 reza abbasi 60 view
2018-10-01 mitra-goli2041 64 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user reza abbasi :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 202, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Moreover
...arities will not affect his life style. moreover, it will be easy for him to give more m...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 109, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
... giving and can benefit in the society. if rich people help charities and build so...
^^
Line 5, column 253, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...they will be more popular among people. they can earn a better position in the socie...
^^^^
Line 5, column 301, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Moreover
... earn a better position in the society. moreover, they will be in a better position to h...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 388, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'belief' (noun) instead of believe (verb)?
Suggestion: belief
...help more charities. I think, with this believe we can see less crime in the society be...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 495, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...ch as stealing is done by needy people. when needy people can satisfy their needs, t...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, moreover, so, for example, i think, in addition, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1700.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 368.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61956521739 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34726618726 2.67179642975 88% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 212.727598566 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.426630434783 0.524837075471 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 537.3 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.354736039 48.9658058833 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.0 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45 5.45110844103 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206469726713 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.081372288871 0.076458572812 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110621043551 0.0737576698707 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137116732141 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120714352873 0.0645574589148 187% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.72 8.01818996416 84% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 86.8835125448 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.