Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.
Nowadays, some hold the opinion that celebrities are more important for younger people than they are to older people, but the others have a negative attitude toward it. As far as I am concerned it is true that celebrities are more significant for younger persons in that not only does celebrities life cause prosperity of them in the future, but also younger people are more emotional.in addition, new statistical research has shown that is more effective for younger persons.
The first reason which should be pointed out here is that, celebrities life cause that the younger persons being more successful in their future life. As a matter of fact, if younger people pay attention to the celebrities life, they will be more successful and they can improve and enhance their efficiency of their life. In order to clarify this statement I state one example, these days we are surrounded by numerous adverse news about a kind of disease such as corona. If younger persons pay attention to the tips that the celebrities say in television, they will be protect themselves more than usual.
The second reason is that, younger persons are more emotional than the older people. Actually, emotional sense play important role in improving strength point of life in younger age. For instance, in the generation of communication focus of younger people are more on the life of celebrities, and it is obvious that the older people are have stable life style and they have not a strong emotional bond.
Furthermore, the new statistical research on this topic In the middle east has shown that there is concrete and undisputed evidence which proves that the overwhelming majority of the different social strata are compatible with this subject, consequently it is clear that the celebrities are more important for younger people than they are to older persons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-02 | YasamanEsml | 83 | view |
| 2023-07-02 | Vivian Chang | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 70 | view |
| 2023-03-31 | sonyeoso | 90 | view |
| 2023-03-27 | mzt123 | 70 | view |
- Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays 63
- It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. 60
- Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays 63
- Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays 63
- some people prefer to focus on ambitious dreams while other thinks realistic goals are more important. which do you prefer and why? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 211, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'celebrities'' or 'celebrity's'?
Suggestion: celebrities'; celebrity's
... if younger people pay attention to the celebrities life, they will be more successful and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 337, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...it is obvious that the older people are have stable life style and they have not a s...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, second, so, for instance, in addition, kind of, such as, as a matter of fact, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 52.1666666667 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1545.0 1977.66487455 78% => OK
No of words: 307.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0325732899 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70840588635 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 212.727598566 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485342019544 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 498.6 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.6003584229 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.1344086022 149% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 83.012288247 48.9658058833 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.5 100.406767564 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.7 20.6045352989 149% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.7 5.45110844103 270% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347677261471 0.236089414692 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156049781915 0.076458572812 204% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750637034316 0.0737576698707 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229823459371 0.150856017488 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415416613539 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 11.7677419355 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 58.1214874552 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.1575268817 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.49 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 86.8835125448 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 10.002688172 195% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.0537634409 139% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 10.247311828 195% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.