Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The most important characteristic to a successful politician or leader is good communication skills.
How, you may wonder, will one’s ability to communicate with others influence his or her political or business career? Some people hold that this is the utmost important characteristic that promotes them to successfully carry out their goal in being politicians or leaders. From my perspective of view, however, I doubt this prove nothing but an overstatement.
Admittedly, outstanding politicians and leaders are, to be fair, almost all equipped with equally outstanding communication skills. Basically, this quality ensures them support, cooperation as well as execution in their career. such as during a political campaign, when a potential President is always giving speeches all over the country, expressing his/her political ideas and thoughts, whether Democratic or Whig, to the public. Without this sort of communication, people are less likely to vote for this candidate because, actually, they don’t even know him/her, let alone trust or support him/her.
However, what is far more important than communication skills turns out to be foresight. Namely, it makes sense that a successful political or leader should be capable of making predictions and planning both in advance and in detail. For instance, in order to achieve the ideal sales of a laptop computer, the marketing manager is supposed to evaluate where their potential customer base lies, where their promising market locates and which advertising approach would be more appropriate. supposing that the marketing manager lacks this sharp insight, he/she is neither possible to survive in the highly competitive market nor granted as successful.
In addition, it is the courage to face challenges that plays an equivalent role in defining a leader or politician as successful. To be more accurate, challenges require people to have the gut to make risky decisions and undertake whatever it might finally bring about. A typical example of this is bill gates, the starter and CEO of microsoft Corporation. Just imagine what will happen if bill gates hesitated about walking down the same and secure path as most of his contemporaries did instead of devoting himself to developing the MS-DOS system? Chances are that, practically, he would not witness the prosperity of his microsoft empire it is now today. With negligence to judgment, suspicion or mock around him, which are also obviously challenges, his risky spirit and efforts are ultimately paid off.
To sum up, despite the importance of communication skills towards the success of a politician or leader, it fails to be the most important one because other qualities, such as foresight and courage, can play an equal or even a more vital part in the career of a successful politician or leader. Only when politicians and leaders reasonably balance the weight of various qualities inside themselves can they fulfill what they desire.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 229, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Such
...n as well as execution in their career. such as during a political campaign, when a ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 490, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Supposing
...ing approach would be more appropriate. supposing that the marketing manager lacks this s...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, however, if, may, so, well, as for, for instance, in addition, sort of, such as, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 13.8261648746 174% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2439.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 452.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39601769912 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9550036146 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 278.0 212.727598566 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615044247788 0.524837075471 117% => OK
syllable_count: 764.1 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1380711507 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.368421053 100.406767564 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7894736842 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94736842105 5.45110844103 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191506212648 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531401815054 0.076458572812 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0695541018721 0.0737576698707 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110483917148 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0677154091923 0.0645574589148 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 11.7677419355 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.01818996416 121% => OK
difficult_words: 140.0 86.8835125448 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.