Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The most important characteristic to a successful politician or leader is good communication skills.
Since the creation of man, many people have been trying to lead other people and they did everything they could to achieve this goal. Nowadays, people wonder whether good communication skills should be considered as the most essential characteristic of any good leader or not. In my opinion, good communication skills are the most important characteristic that every leader, who is looking for success, should have. It helps leaders to convince their subordinates easier. Moreover, it would help them to make more friends that would be helpful for them. I will illustrate my reasons in the next paragraphs.
First, Leaders, who could communicate with others skillfully, can easily convince them in a variety of situations. Indeed, unlike unsuccessful leaders, they can recognize each situation and explain their opinion according to that specific situation’s condition. They can use a different tune, feeling, etc as an advantage to attract other people. For instance, I am a fan of the Esteghlal football club. Last year, they didn’t play well at all and they even lost their easy matches. Indeed, there wasn’t any harmony between players. Although the coach did everything he could to change the situation, he wasn’t successful. After several weeks, Team’s managers decided to change the coach. Surprisingly, they showed great harmony and win the game with a good score. Indeed, according to the interview of the new coach, hiring the day before, he hadn’t enough time to change any determinants except talking with players and convincing them they are good enough to win any match.
Second, good communication skills help people to make more friends. For sure, there isn’t any successful leader who doesn't have a bunch of friends. Friends help each other to get through the difficulties. Thus, if you have a lot of friends, you would be able to use their help whenever you need it. Thereby, friends push you forward to be a good leader. As an example, Imagine, you want to become a candidate for your city council. If you have a lot of friends who are ready to help you, at least you would have more votes. Moreover, they can advertise for you around the city and make more votes for you. Thus, good communication leads to making more friend which is helpful for you to become a great leader.
Based on the aforementioned reasons, it can be concluded that good communication skills are the most important characteristic to become a great leader.
- Few people devote time to hobbies nowadays Say why you think this is the case and what effect this has on the individual and society in general Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 56
- Your friend has the opportunity to choose either one of two types of majors (fields of study), which one of the following two majors do you think is a better choice, and why?– A major that would allow him to finish years of study and get a degree sooner 73
- TPO 49 76
- Some people believe that climate change has the greatest effect on people s way of life Others believe the economy of the region has the greatest effect Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- You share a parking area with several neighbours and have recently started having problems explain Ghr problems suggesting ways to help situation proposing a possible meeting 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 122, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...re isn't any successful leader who doesnt have a bunch of friends. Friends help e...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, moreover, second, so, thus, well, at least, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2082.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 408.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10294117647 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88264366781 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514705882353 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 622.8 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0346720404 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.0769230769 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6923076923 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.38461538462 5.45110844103 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 22.0 11.8709677419 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217496415183 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0680653087414 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0802275871249 0.0737576698707 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163946514313 0.150856017488 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0706329327006 0.0645574589148 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.