Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The most important characteristics for a politician or leader is good communication ability.

War and peace, these two words change people's life entirely. War or peace is done and prepared by politicians. Through history, many wars could have been avoided if the leader was more flexible and had good communication ability with other countries politicians. Having this feature means the person listens well to other and capable to persuade others with his point of view. Even though, there are other qualities a politician should be characterized with such as power, loyalty, capability to take a decision, still these capacities are not efficient without good communication ability. Actually, I strongly agree with the statement saying "The most important characteristics for a politician or leader is good communication ability". Below, are two cases to explain my point of view.

First of all, a country could face different and sudden issues especially in modern era, due to rapid and continuously variable events all over the world. So a leader of a community should find solutions for all the problems his country may meet. For instance, Egypt recently faced a problem of water resources, because Ethiopia intends to build a dam on Nile river. There were some signs of beginning war between the two countries. But, due to Alsisi's (Egypt President) wisdom and good communication ability, this issue seemed to be solved.

On the other side, the leader may experience an issue enforces him to take a decision, which from the first impression, against his community desires and demands. However, for the long-term this decision is for its benefit. To clarify this point let us take an example. In 1973, Iraq nationalize oil, but to manage the tools and economic to set it up, Al-bakir (Iraq president) had to plan an austerity policy for two years. He had to satisfy his people about the advantages of such resolution. If he did not have pretty communication capability, he would have been failed.
To sum it up, one of the most important qualities a leader should have, is "how far he can convince others about his plans", so that they can support him to achieve it.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 416, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... Even though, there are other qualities a politician should be characterized wit...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ility, this issue seemed to be solved. On the other side, the leader may experi...
^^^
Line 6, column 179, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat they can support him to achieve it.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, if, may, so, still, well, for instance, such as, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.0286738351 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1752.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 347.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04899135447 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.841063034 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596541786744 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.9325861327 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2105263158 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2631578947 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84210526316 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240363995526 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.064755681645 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101814119576 0.0737576698707 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128711946916 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0914245818526 0.0645574589148 142% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.