Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Society benefits more from works of great artists than from politic leaders.

Society is a group of members affect and benefit each other. And always there is a politic leader who manage and leads this society. Artists are people who create art works which sometimes express their opinion about a specific issue in that society. And his point of view may reflect the society desire and needs. Their achievements attribute in civilization. But who support them to do these arts? It is a movement of a whole community. And there is an effective leader who direct it. They are the politic leaders. So I disagree with this statement.

People want to survive and they need to improve their income due to the increasing life requirements. Only politic leaders who has the keys to affect on economic and improve the people status. They can encourage to build more factories, intense construction in a certain area and other variations that lead to increase job opportunities and then increase income. For example, in my country Iraq, n the seventies there was a wide progress in construction, industrialization, farming and others. People at that time earn high income and living level was the best in the world. In eighties, when war started economical situation went down and every thing got worse. Who did this change? they are the politic leaders.

Furthermore, life is variable and as long as it is changing, people need new laws suit these changes. For instance, internet did not exist in seventies, so there were no need for laws to be set to organize its usage. Nowadays, every few years we need new legislation to avoid the big issues adjoined the rapid progress in social media and other use of internet. Who has the right to do such impact? Again it is the politic leaders.

Education, is another tool in the politic leaders hands. They can plan and decide what kind of education they want their societies to believe in. Like what happen in Russia, most of soviate people believe in communism. On the other hand most of american believe in imperialism. Who direct those people to believe in these thoughts? It is the politic leaders.

In sum, if the decision taken by the politic leaders was good, then the society would benefit of it. If not, they would get the hell!!

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 144, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...nly politic leaders who has the keys to affect on economic and improve the people status....
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'building'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: building
...e the people status. They can encourage to build more factories, intense construction in...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 423, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'wide progress'.
Suggestion: wide progress
...country Iraq, n the seventies there was a wide progress in construction, industrialization, far...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 606, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...he world. In eighties, when war started economical situation went down and every thing got...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 685, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...y thing got worse. Who did this change? they are the politic leaders. Furthermor...
^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... If not, they would get the hell!!
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, may, so, then, for example, for instance, kind of, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1836.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 380.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83157894737 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61253106385 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552631578947 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 20.6003584229 150% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.1344086022 60% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.6753479325 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 59.2258064516 100.406767564 59% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.2580645161 20.6045352989 59% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.90322580645 5.45110844103 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88709677419 246% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142613748861 0.236089414692 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0484985234249 0.076458572812 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659632306591 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0806124480118 0.150856017488 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479228168067 0.0645574589148 74% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.4 11.7677419355 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.76 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.1575268817 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.85 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 4.0 10.002688172 40% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.0537634409 68% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.