University always has to find ways to cover the education, professors, and students requirements. Education tools are developed so rapidly, so that if the university did not capture any chance to develop it would be behind. So, if I was the one who has to take the decision, I would improve the quality of the technology provides for student instead of redesigning space for meeting.
First of all, nowadays competition between universities is high and to get good reputation a university should improve the technology at campus. Let us say, there is a need to bring more developed microscope for biology laboratory which let students grab more information about a cell. If the university ignore it and redesign the meeting club, the students would feel the university take care for appearance more than science and they would not respect the campus policy.
On the other hand meetings could be done in anywhere, it does not deserve to waste money. For example, university can benefit from other area such as cafeteria, or classrooms and do simple alteration that can be used for meetings.
- The university has money in its budget to do one thing to improve its facilities for students. It can either improve the quality of the technology that it provides for students. Or it can redesign spaces where students hold club meetings and gather with 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The most important characteristics for a politician or leader is good communication ability. 76
- You are facing a problem with your neighbour who is leaving rubbish near your house.Write a letter to your neighbour. In your letter- introduce yourself- explain the problem-Provide an appropriate solution 56
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Society benefits more from works of great artists than from politic leaders. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 232, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...teration that can be used for meetings.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, as to, for example, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 43.0788530466 21% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 52.1666666667 33% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 912.0 1977.66487455 46% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 182.0 407.700716846 45% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01098901099 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 4.48103885553 82% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83028372739 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 212.727598566 56% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.653846153846 0.524837075471 125% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 618.680645161 49% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 20.6003584229 39% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.5127091267 48.9658058833 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.375 5.45110844103 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294809386952 0.236089414692 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118193243937 0.076458572812 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0909072840871 0.0737576698707 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185826891191 0.150856017488 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0149093569636 0.0645574589148 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 86.8835125448 51% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.