Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The most important characteristic of a successful politician or leader is good communication skills
Some successful politicians or leaders obtain several characteristics. While they hold profound knowledge, others acquire significant communication skills. It is so controvertible for their important characteristic of them to decide their skills. In my view, the most important individuals for people who are successful politician or leader is communication abilities. They can lead their colleague, attain improved mental for public speech, and establish more links with others by this ability.
To begin with, communication skills definitely lead fellows of people who are politicians or leaders. Generally speaking, leaders have to make conversations with workers. If it is not enough to ask the bothers from their fellows by the leaders, the motivation of co-workers will gradually decrease. In addition, the demand for their company will culminate. Therefore, communication with workers makes people successful in following their colleagues.
Secondly, people are capable of acquiring the mental for the speech by communication skills. It is clear that a successful leader has the opportunity to speak in front of bountiful people. The listener will certainly not obedient to the leader if he cannot make a proficient speech. As a result, the assessment of him will be clearly degraded. Hence, it is essential for valued people who are politicians or leaders to obtain sophisticated speech skills by provided communication ability.
Finally, connecting with others is constructed by the communication skills of successful politicians or leaders. People who have advanced the abilities to talk with others sometimes make plenty of friends or fellows natural. These people sometimes take their hands to concerned leaders. They also establish places to connect with other people. Consequently, the leader will be one of the successful people.
To sum up, it is clear that the crucial ability is communication for the politician or leader who achieves success. I confidently believe that their fellows complain to them by communication skills, they are ready for speaking in front of many people, and a large amount of connections with others is built.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-10 | akimasa7887 | 65 | view |
- Doing which activity do you think can better help you strengthen the friendship between you and your friend having a good time together with your friend solving your friend s problem with him or her 60
- Do you agree or disagree It is important for people to watch and read news presented by other who hold different views than others hold similar views 71
- In order to improve your presentation skill which of the following method do you think is more effective To watch video recording of the speech To practice with classmates or colleagues 42
- The company would like to invest in improving employees work Which way do you think is better to help employees become more adept to new technology to redesign the working environment to be more comfortable and spacious 76
- In high school classes which of the following way is the most effective way to stimulate students interest using technology in the classroom more often more group work introduce how knowledge is related to daily life 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 71, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...kills definitely lead fellows of people who are politicians or leaders. Generally speak...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 386, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...ence, it is essential for valued people who are politicians or leaders to obtain sophis...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, finally, hence, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, in addition, as a result, in my view, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1868.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 332.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6265060241 4.8611393121 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19117941685 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490963855422 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 560.7 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.7352355217 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.9090909091 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0909090909 20.6045352989 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.45454545455 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260942850822 0.236089414692 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0919319692505 0.076458572812 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0778376445139 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16696416747 0.150856017488 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029462130745 0.0645574589148 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 58.1214874552 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.78 10.9000537634 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.