Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? For most jobs or areas of work, understanding the limits of your knowledge is more important than the knowledge you have. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
" half knowledge is more dangerous than having no knowledge ". I find this quote extremely encouraging. it says that we should never update ourselves with half learning, otherwise, we will end up in nowhere. it is better to remain ignorant about it. based upon this fact, I believe that for working areas, understanding the limitations of our knowledge is much better than the knowledge we have. I consider this for two reasons which I will elaborate on in the following passage.
In my opinion, the theoretical concept that we study in college or school is completely different from the practical scenario. knowledge of a book is all based upon the experimental results which were conducted in an ideal condition while idea which has been applied at job areas are not hypothetical. For instance, take an example of the work process of the manufacturing industries. Although the industry process is based upon basic theory, the reality is different. All the steps rely upon the current operating condition which can vary depending upon the yield. manufacturing industry never runs on an academic concept rather than following the practical experience. this example supports the argument that we should know the limit of our knowledge which is applied to the working system, otherwise, it will lead to undesirable products. The knowledge is not sufficient, we must understand the limits.
Moreover, the same concept applies to the psychological nature of a human. every person is unique and has a different perception. No one, in this world is right or wrong. Therefore, If we want to get adjust to this diverse system. we should not depend upon the knowledge we have. this is human nature when a person experiences a good or bad result. human behavior gets modified according to the consequence and he/she create a general concept in the mind and then work accordingly. But, this idea is not appropriate because we are not aware about the other person situation. take an example of human Rseource management team of a corporate company, managers never consider their knowledge as important because they are trained to limit their concept. hr team knows that never employee in the organisation is different so they cannot apply same psychological concept on everyone.
To sum up, In my opinion, we should limit our knowledge in working areas becuase our knowledge is not applicable in every situation. As I explain with an example of the concept used in industries and psychological knowledge of hr team of an organization
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 115, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... find this quote extremely encouraging. it says that we should never update oursel...
^^
Line 1, column 219, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
..., otherwise, we will end up in nowhere. it is better to remain ignorant about it. ...
^^
Line 6, column 128, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Knowledge
... different from the practical scenario. knowledge of a book is all based upon the experim...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 567, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Manufacturing
...hich can vary depending upon the yield. manufacturing industry never runs on an academic conc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 672, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...han following the practical experience. this example supports the argument that we s...
^^^^
Line 11, column 76, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Every
...to the psychological nature of a human. every person is unique and has a different pe...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 232, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...t to get adjust to this diverse system. we should not depend upon the knowledge we...
^^
Line 11, column 281, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
... not depend upon the knowledge we have. this is human nature when a person experienc...
^^^^
Line 11, column 350, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Human
...erson experiences a good or bad result. human behavior gets modified according to the...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 419, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'creates'.
Suggestion: creates
...according to the consequence and he/she create a general concept in the mind and then ...
^^^^^^
Line 11, column 576, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Take
...aware about the other person situation. take an example of human Rseource management...
^^^^
Line 11, column 752, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Hr
...hey are trained to limit their concept. hr team knows that never employee in the o...
^^
Line 11, column 839, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sation is different so they cannot apply same psychological concept on everyone. ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, while, for instance, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2142.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 417.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13669064748 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91166997768 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491606714628 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 680.4 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.9603647358 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.3846153846 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0384615385 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.76923076923 5.45110844103 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 5.5376344086 235% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 15.0 4.88709677419 307% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210268083117 0.236089414692 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0579161919596 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684539610547 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153269477604 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605421212746 0.0645574589148 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.