Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Nowadays, it is easier for people to maintain good health than those living in the past. Use specific examples to support your answer.
When it comes to the question of whether it is easier for today’s people to keep up good health than those living in the past, the answers differ considerably from individual to individual. Some people may claim that it is reasonable because of better hygiene conditions in modern society, while others hold an opposite view. From my perspective, I stand with the latter.
First of all, people living in the past usually did not eat processed foods. In the old days, the majority of people lived by cultivating crops and vegetables on their own, so that they could get fresh food more easily than modern people. People in the past usually ate exactly what they planted and sometimes those exchanged from neighborhoods. There is no or at least little processed food in their life. For example, in an agricultural society as my grandmother used to live in her childhood, it was more facile for people to get natural food such as vegetables harvested straight from their own farm. By contrast, individuals in modern cities spend a lot of their mealtime eating outside, that makes them have trouble keeping a balanced diet. They can hardly receive enough fresh food, and consequently, cannot get sufficient nutrients they need; that may lead them to poor health condition unless they change their lifestyle.
Besides, many modern people keep bad habits in life. With the change of human society from an agricultural-based one to an industrial and commercial one, people’s lifestyle also greatly changed. Because of the change of the working pattern in recent days, individuals nowadays are used to several unhealthy habits, such as staying up late, consistently eating junk food, and doing exercise less than before. A hectic and stressful lifestyle that is widely adopted by modern people leads to a consequence that diseases of civilization including cancers, diabetes, and obesity occur more frequently and even pop out at a rising rate. As a result, people nowadays can hardly develop healthy habits, which help them maintain good health, due to health-damaging habits and the modern lifestyle.
Admittedly, some people might argue that people of today have a better health condition than before because of advanced medical technologies and more information that is easily accessed for people who long to become healthier. However, there are truly more and more people suffering from chronic diseases in recent days. In spite of getting more new and accurate information than people in the past, individuals nowadays are still having trouble keeping their bodies in good condition. Therefore, I firmly believe that it will not be easier for people nowadays maintain full health than the ancient.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Nowadays, it is easier for people to maintain good health than those living in the past. Use specific examples to support your answer. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Nowadays, it is easier for people to maintain good health than those living in the past. Use specific examples to support your answer. 80
- Agree or disagree: Instead of asking college students to pay their tuition immediately for education, they should be allowed to pay for it at a set percentage out of their salary after they graduate. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 18, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
When it comes to the question of whether it is easier for today's people to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 356, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
... exchanged from neighborhoods. There is no or at least little processed food in th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, first, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, while, at least, for example, such as, as a result, first of all, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2283.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 438.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21232876712 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75571532876 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541095890411 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 701.1 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2792306322 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.157894737 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0526315789 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.05263157895 5.45110844103 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239120058854 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0788805546831 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679618899702 0.0737576698707 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162649852335 0.150856017488 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413225212089 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.