do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Nowadays people are more willing to help people they don't know (for example, by giving clothing and food to people who need them) than they were in the past.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer Be sure to use your own words. Do not use memorized examples
It has been in humans' nature to help those who are in need. We have been encouraged by our society to try to assist those who are less fortunate than us. Evidently, the societies evolve and we get rid of the ideas that are not beneficial. So, when it comes to helping people who are in need of help, have the societies lost the sense of responsibility to help others or we are more likely to pursue this novel practice. In my opinion, people are more likely to help others, even those that they do not know, due to several reasons.
One of the reasons is that, the global transportation systems have evolved significantly in the recent years. Due to the increasing practice, which is called globalization, goods and products are being shipped regularly around the world. This developed infrastructure is also being utilized as means to transfer philantropic gifts such as foods or cloths. For instance, many foundations in North American and Europe ship commodities to poorer regions of Africa or Asia. This practice has been fascilitated by the global shipping infrastructure.
Secondly, social media is being rightly used as a mean to inform people about the struggles of poorer folks. Some foundations, utilize social media for informing people in the developed countries about the struggles that poor people go through. In addition to that, people are organizing fundraising campaigns on social media platforms which is accessible to many philantropists. It also helps that contributors can see their contributions through pictures and videos that are shared on social media assuring that they have not been wasted, which will in turn encourage further endowments.
Finally, the people in more developed regions have been well-informed on the importance of sustainability and recycling. The folks who are concerned about the environment, avoid throwing out their surplus food or clothings, but rather gift them. These gifts are then being transfered to the people who need them. The act of being environmentally conscious, has helped the environment, as well as encouraged people to help the poor.
To conclude, people have variety of tools in their position to help others who are in need, and have been using them. Some might argue that we are becoming more selfish and self-engaged and we have forgotten about others, but more fortunate people always exploit the opportunity to help. The developed international trading transportation systems, social media awareness and concerns about sustainability are among the reasons that have provided people with more means and reasons to help others.
- The Salton sea in California 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Providing Internet access is just as important as other services such as building roads so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost Use specific reasons and examples 73
- Because of climate change more and more land that was once used to grow crops or provide food for animals is turning to dry unusable desert land There are many proposals about how to stop this process known as desertification A number of proposals involve 85
- An airship is a type of aircraft that flies using a very large balloon filled with a lighter than air gas Airships were an important means of air transportation before the 1940s but are little used today having been largely replaced by airplanes and helic 81
- People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who focus on one skill only 70
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, second, secondly, so, then, well, for instance, in addition, such as, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 15.1003584229 199% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2192.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 420.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21904761905 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95612665616 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504761904762 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 682.2 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7629597807 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.380952381 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27772718575 0.236089414692 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0881748287759 0.076458572812 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646290556209 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157754987353 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0678813154552 0.0645574589148 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, second, secondly, so, then, well, for instance, in addition, such as, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 15.1003584229 199% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2192.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 420.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21904761905 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95612665616 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504761904762 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 682.2 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7629597807 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.380952381 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27772718575 0.236089414692 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0881748287759 0.076458572812 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646290556209 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157754987353 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0678813154552 0.0645574589148 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.