Nowadays people are more willing to help people they don't know (for example, by giving clothing and food to people who need them) than they were in the past.
In modern days, it appears to some that due to the popularization of mandatory education and increasing living standards, people show more politeness and kindness to strangers than ever before. Others maintain a negative view showing goodwill is a part of social convention, it has existed for a long time. Both of these ideas have their bases, they need to be scrutinized meticulously, in my opinion, all developments do level up the standard of conscience and now have positive feedback to society.
First of all, from an educational perspective, these years, the low rate of illiteracy has broken the all-time record ever listed which means even the most deprived people from the fringe region may have a chance to get educated. Mandatory education paves way for civilization and forms the populaces into civilized individuals. Those who benefited from it may have a sense of obligation to repay. For example, persons who hail from rural area recognize the plight and survival dilemma of the poor more than those who were raised in relatively prosperous cities. When it comes to a tricky poverty alleviation project, they know how and where to step forward to assure necessities and prop up the livelihoods of the farmers, thus a virtuous cycle forms.
Moreover, from a spiritual perspective, education and infrastructure as cornerstones set up an escalator to a spacious world where people gain more opportunities to explore their own careers. Satisfying Basic survival needs is not an urgent priority anymore. Instead, intrapersonal affluence, rather than monetary affluence is what people truly yearn for nowadays.
For instance, my aunt Nancy, who was born in the underclass of China, neither received an education at a young age nor had the concept of reciprocation, helping others was a luxurious and meaningless thing. After the lifting standard of livelihood and literacy level, showing kindness to others become a sort of belief where she can get salvation from mutual happiness.
A voice rises that being warm-hearted is a kind of righteousness which has existed through the ages, it is not a novel concept. In essence, humanity has never changed.
However, without developmental benefits, that righteousness is only in between elite people and the upper class, and won't be as prevalent as it is right now.
Therefore, being willing to help is a fruit of various cultivations. And we also should live each day with gentleness, vigor, and a keenness of appreciation which are often left behind when living in the constant panorama of life. While there are one thousand Hamlets in one thousand people's eyes, I think my opponents will compromise after reading my article.
- Technology internet has made children less creative than they were in the past It has more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave 90
- Grades marks encourage students to learn 90
- It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation 90
- After completing high school students should take at least a year off to work or travel before they begin studying at a university 90
- In many places students must arrive very early in the morning to attend school Some people believe that starting the school day early is the best approach to support learning but others believe that starting the school day at a later time in the morning w 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, i think, kind of, sort of, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2261.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 435.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19770114943 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56690854021 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97807552103 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 270.0 212.727598566 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620689655172 0.524837075471 118% => OK
syllable_count: 714.6 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7021641805 48.9658058833 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8947368421 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.89473684211 5.45110844103 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.53405017921 154% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224469421348 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.056302730734 0.076458572812 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438011165219 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0904088395936 0.150856017488 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532215532987 0.0645574589148 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.01818996416 121% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 86.8835125448 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.