Nowadays people are more willing to help people they don't know (for example, by giving clothing and food to people who need them) than they were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer Be sure to use your own words. Do not use memorized examples.
In modern era, advances in technology are altering all aspects of humans' lives dramatically. Nowadays, social media have paved the way for informing individuals of everyday events around the world. Besides, it is advantageous in order to make people aware of those individuals who are in need. In this regard, the inevitable question which has always caused heated debate among people is that whether these days people are more reluctant to help people they do not know or people do not tend to denote their time and money to them. From my vantage point, notwithstanding all the deleterious effects of social media on our lives, it makes an excellent contribution to helping the poor. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into two conspicuous reasons to elaborate on my standpoint.
The most significant point to be mentioned is that due to becoming aware of the difficulties of shortcoming people throughout the world, people are more inclined to express their support. Moreover, human activists are making all their efforts to eradicate inequalities in societies which plays a prevailing role in making people cushion needed people. Take a personal experience as an example, as a result of advertising on the internet to advocate those people who have suffered from a horrible earthquake, my friend was impressed. She allocated a considerable amount of her savings to help those people. As a consequence, the impact of social media on supporting people in need is inevitable.
Another paramount reason which should be referred to is that today, owing to being exposed to artistic environments, people have developed empathy. Accordingly, nowadays, people behave with each other smoothly and are concerned about the living condition of poor people. Furthermore, a groundbreaking study, which has been conducted in my country recently, revealed that these days people are more worried about different people. Therefore, if people have empathy, they will more likely to help people in need.
To recapitulate, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that these days individuals have an inclination to support people who they do not know, for not only social media expose people to become aware of their hardships, but also people have developed empathy which makes individuals become more concern about events around them. As far as I am concerned, I recommend that people keep helping the people.
- Nowadays people are more willing to help people they don t know for example by giving clothing and food to people who need them than they were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer Be sure to use your own words Do not use me 80
- It is more important to read or watch news presented by people whose views are different from your own than it is to read or watch news presented by those whose views are similar to your own 76
- It is more important to read and watch news presented by people whose opinion is different from your own view than by people whose opinion are similar to yours 76
- Providing Internet access is just as important as other services such as building roads so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost 76
- People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who focus on one skill only Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, besides, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2036.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 387.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26098191214 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94508356698 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542635658915 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 656.1 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.3567377704 48.9658058833 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.764705882 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7647058824 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05882352941 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288645690121 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103190312429 0.076458572812 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844417219299 0.0737576698707 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207852944892 0.150856017488 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0193856028453 0.0645574589148 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.