Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Our current way of life will have a negative impact on future generations.
I believe that whatever we do have some or other impacts on the future generation. Hands down, I certainly agree that the current lifestyle will have a negative impact on future generations. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explain in this essay.
To begin with, people nowadays have become lazier as compared to the past. Due to all the technologies most of the people hardly do any work at home. Obviously, this will reduce more in the future with increasing gadgets or machines. In other words, humans will have machines or kinds of robots to do all the work. Consequently, most of us will just be sitting in a place for most of the days making us lazier. This is best demonstrated by my personal experience. I have a friend, whose buys food directly for the stores which are ready to eat. She has a robot vacuum that cleans her house, dishwasher for the dishes if she eats at home. Also, Alexa is the one reading books to her kids. She also owns a self-driving car. As a result, she just does personal care things, taking bathing and dressing up. If technology would not have been this developed, she would be doing all this on her own.
Secondly, more technologies have to lead us to have fewer friends. Most of us are busy with phones, laptops, or Ipads just for entertainment. Evidently, it has reduced our time spending with other people. In short, we have been developing relations with machines. in short, our world is becoming narrower. As opposed to the past where people use to talk or hang out with others for entertainment. Hence, future generations will be more connected by machines rather than people. For instance, kids recently, ask for Ipad or phone. Additionally, even in restaurants, kids are never seen having conversations with parents; they are just busy with video games or social networking. Thus, family bonding is ending. If phone or Ipad have not taken place of relations we could have saved this.
In conclusion, the current way of life will definitely have a negative effect future. This is because of reduced physical work and less bonding in all relations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 51, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ith, people nowadays have become lazier as compared to the past. Due to all the te...
^^
Line 5, column 265, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...een developing relations with machines. in short, our world is becoming narrower. ...
^^
Line 5, column 343, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...er. As opposed to the past where people use to talk or hang out with others for ent...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, hence, if, second, secondly, so, thus, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, in short, as a result, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1748.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 368.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65572975279 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551630434783 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.1344086022 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.018515174 48.9658058833 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 62.4285714286 100.406767564 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.1428571429 20.6045352989 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 17.0 4.88709677419 348% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28934791432 0.236089414692 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0752661990189 0.076458572812 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0828784674682 0.0737576698707 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205452161687 0.150856017488 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0756431737942 0.0645574589148 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.5 11.7677419355 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.38 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.0537634409 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.