we are witnessing a very large hype about colonization of mars. But we should actually colonize Saturn's moon Titan. If we are willing to start the colonization of our solar system.
The article and the lecture both discusses about the colonization of humans on Mars. While the author says that habitable zone of Titan would be more preferred than the Mars. The lecturer opposes the claims made by the writer in the article.
Firstly, the writer claims that the atmospheric pressure of Titan is similar to that of Earth. However, the lecturer claims that atmospheric pressure is not the only thing required for colonization. In addition, the lecturer also explains that Human settlement requires water for existence. Whereas, Titan have reserves of methane which can only be used as fuel.
Secondly, the reading of the text says that Titan’s gravity is lower than Earth which can help in reducing the fuel usage by rockets for take-off. On the other hand, the lecturer opines that low gravity have shown to have negative effects on Heart rate of humans as seen in astronauts. The lecturer also explains that lower heart rates would be dangerous in long run for human beings.
Lastly, the authors asserts that though Titan is far from Earth compared to Mars lowered fuel use can make it certain to colonization. In contrast, the lecturer explains that it would take more time for humans to send message or required material to Titans than Mars. According to lecturer it won’t be convenient for humans to begin settlement on Titan.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 86, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...out the colonization of humans on Mars. While the author says that habitable zone of ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, lastly, second, secondly, so, whereas, while, in addition, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1129.0 1373.03311258 82% => OK
No of words: 227.0 270.72406181 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97356828194 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48797687203 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 145.348785872 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519823788546 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 348.3 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.5805954564 49.2860985944 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.8461538462 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4615384615 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.23076923077 7.06452816374 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.057374472664 0.272083759551 21% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0262673395985 0.0996497079465 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0363878168317 0.0662205650399 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0433499172489 0.162205337803 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0296806489497 0.0443174109184 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.3589403974 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.