Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Our current way of life will have a negative impact on future generations Use specific reasons and examples to support your essay Be sure to use your own words

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Our current way of life will have a negative impact on future generations.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your essay. Be sure to use your own words.

From last century our way of living have changed drastically. The Industrial revolution, advancement in technology, etc. Made impact on our life. Some will agree that the impact is positive, but if we think critically our way of life will have negative impact on future generation. I feel this way for many reasons, which I will explain in fallowing paragraph.

To begin with, we are using our non-renewable sources like there is no tommorow. We have no policay to reduce the use of non-renewable sources like cole, petrolium, oil. For example, In 2019, 80% of electricity generation of world used cole as fuel. Some experiment show that we have only century of fuel left, if didn’t take any action to reduce use of natual fuel our next generation will have to face concequences of our doing.

Secondly, our use of cars is increasing day by day and it have negative impact on climate. Cars, electric power plant, industries are emitting carbon dioxide which is cause of global warming and climate change. For example, In last decade we saw the biggest change in global temperature which is the main reason for the melting of Antartic ice. In my personal experience, my parents told me that when they were young they never experience non-seasonal rain, However, in last five year there has been dramatic change in climate. It is a clearly cause of our way of living.

To conclude, I agree that our way of living will have a negative impact on future generation. This is because our increased use of non-renewable sources, and because our increased use of a products that emits carbon dioxide which causes global worming and climate change

Votes
Average: 8.5 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-10-30 GRACE_047 70 view
2021-08-29 Prazwal Neupane 73 view
2020-11-19 Pravin s. jadhav 85 view
2020-07-12 Gurjot kaur bhatia 76 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Pravin s. jadhav :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 267, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'shows'.
Suggestion: shows
...orld used cole as fuel. Some experiment show that we have only century of fuel left,...
^^^^
Line 5, column 59, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
...of cars is increasing day by day and it have negative impact on climate. Cars, elect...
^^^^
Line 5, column 535, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('clearly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('cause') instead of another adjective.
... been dramatic change in climate. It is a clearly cause of our way of living. To conclude, I...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 188, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a product' or simply 'products'?
Suggestion: a product; products
...urces, and because our increased use of a products that emits carbon dioxide which causes ...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, secondly, so, for example, i feel, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1369.0 1977.66487455 69% => OK
No of words: 280.0 407.700716846 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88928571429 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72186676262 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 212.727598566 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532142857143 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 618.680645161 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.3018482065 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.5625 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274100518869 0.236089414692 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105687502716 0.076458572812 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0843181907944 0.0737576698707 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184502306352 0.150856017488 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0609817784234 0.0645574589148 94% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.