Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Overall the widespread use of the internet has a mostly positive effect on life in today s world Use reasons and details to support your opinion

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? “Overall, the widespread use of the internet has a mostly positive effect on life in today’s world.” Use reasons and details to support your opinion.

These days, people use the internet for marketing, contacting, receiving information, and the internet brings people a lot of conveniences. In my opinion, relaying the internet also causes many negative effects. There are some reasons why I feel this way.

First and foremost, the appearance of the internet makes people can get others’ information easily. People are used to writing their name, email address, and even phone number on Facebook and post their daily life on their Instagram. Further, almost everyone has a communication account, such as WhatsApp, Line, and WeChat, and convenient social networking makes those account information become available for strangers. It is annoying, while it could be dangerous as well. My personal experience can demonstrate this. Once I went to a bank to create an account for receiving my wage. Surprisingly, the staff told me that my identity number has been used by another person before, so I can create the account there. She told me the name that I do not know, and I even cannot imagine how and why it happened. I guess that maybe I enter my ID number sometimes for signing up an account of games, shops, and the like, and some people took it to sale or for other purposes. Thus, I think that by social networking, nowadays revealing our personal information is much easier.

Moreover, although the internet solves plenty of problems and makes human life become more convenient, relying on the internet to solve their problems that let people have fewer chances to think. Since there are many resources on the internet, people can search for them on the search engine when they have any questions. Over time, more people are used to find the answers by their smartphones and laptops, instead of thinking on their own. It is not a good phenomenon, because when their mobile devices are not available, they do not know what they should do. Consider google map, for instance. In the past, people needed to remember all of the roads they were using and had a precise sense of direction. Since once they got lost, it was not easy for them to find the right ways, and they may need to ask other passerby or even go to the police station. Compare to the habits of people today, most people usually open the google map when they go outside, even it is only a short distance. Therefore, people should not rely on applications on their mobile devices too much, because sometimes they can do nothing without the internet.

In conclusion, I strongly believe that there are not mostly positive effects today from using the internet. This is because using social platforms makes confidential information reveal easier. Additionally, relying on using technology to address every problem will decrease the thinking ability of humans.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 637, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... In the past, people needed to remember all of the roads they were using and had a precise...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, i feel, i guess, i think, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2315.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 467.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95717344754 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64867537961 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6192367264 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541755888651 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 730.8 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.86738351254 428% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7755909593 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.68 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150956290565 0.236089414692 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0469404223075 0.076458572812 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585235203795 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123307509322 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0634636312209 0.0645574589148 98% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.