Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Parents today are more involved in their children s education than parents were in the past

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

Parents today are more involved in their children's education than parents were in the past.

Nowadays, children have many chances to develop themself. They enable to do many things rather than children in the past because their parents indulge more to their studying. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.

First of all, many people always try to find the best schools for their kids to study. Because they think that good schools have good teachers and good friends, which will create a perfect academic environment for them to develop without worrying about any bullies. In addition, they are not only care about their children, but also care to their teachers. Therefore, they will do many things than last generations to get a chance to put their kids in the high ranked schools. My own experience is a compelling example of this. When my first son started to go first grade, me and my husband considered a lot about which school we should send him. Hence, we searched all the schools in our city and nearby cities where have the highest ranked school in the state. Consequently, we had to spend almost 3 months to call to each school and scheduled for a school tour before giving a final decision. But it was totally worth for us, because ultimately both of us felt satisfied about one school which was very suitable for my son's growth with warm friends and enthusiastic teachers.

Secondly, parents these days spend more money to invest on the other skills for children such as musical instrument, sports. I feel that our kids are more talented than the kids in the past. Because most of them know how to play at least one among many instruments. Furthermore, some kids can do well both in music and sports. My own son's experience will shed an example on this point. I knew how would be important for kids to know some music in early stage, so I sent him to some tutors in piano and drum. Not only this, I hired a private professional athlete to teach him about soccer. And thanks to my knowledge, my son could play well piano and got some first prizes on the contest at his school. Had I not used my money to send him to private teachers to learn these instruments, he would not have been a talented person like this.

In conclusion, I totally agree that parents today are investing much money and their effort for their own children's education. It is because they care to the best academic environment for their kids to grow and because they send their children to join many classes, not only studying at school.

Votes
Average: 6.5 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-02-14 joyce05 60 view
2022-03-24 Kinga Wangmo 68 view
2021-09-12 ambition kasra 76 view
2021-09-12 ambition kasra 76 view
2021-05-23 mahi22 70 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user anhvu :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 192, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ore talented than the kids in the past. Because most of them know how to play at least ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, as to, at least, i feel, in addition, in conclusion, such as, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 43.0788530466 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2037.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 442.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60859728507 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38580104811 2.67179642975 89% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502262443439 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 603.0 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5970074826 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5652173913 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2173913043 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4347826087 5.45110844103 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16258823953 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0542773724427 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0827860795625 0.0737576698707 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142026497476 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0820006972873 0.0645574589148 127% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.94 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.