Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
A controversial issue relating to what type of career or job would ensure a decent standard of living and a relatively prosperous life has been brought to the attention of the public. Relevant authorities are urged that people were more likely to acquire safe and triumphant jobs in the last century. From a personal point of view, the above statement is disagreeable because of some reasons as below.
To begin with, the modern society has more effective ways to obtain useful information than ever before. To be more specific, televisions, mobile phones as well as computers could give individuals access to valuable messages as long as they are connected to the Internet. Applicants could use those modern technology products to discover the development of the world and what kind of profession would be promising around the markets in the future. Under these circumstances, candidates deserve well-paid and stable jobs by collecting sufficient messages. In contrast, there was no valid approach for applicants to obtain knowledge about career development in the past. They might accept their parents' opinions about selecting professions, which were traditional and did not accurately indicate what type of vocation would bring a bright future. Therefore, it is hard for candidates to distinguish what businesses would have a successful prospect in the last generation.
What is more, in current society, people are more likely to communicate with each other so that they have more chances to succeed. Graduates nowadays prefer to listen to the standpoints of their mentors and the employees at the university's job center on employment. Both those experienced advisors could give them advices about what kind of job is suitable for the long run so that students would not make mistakes in choosing careers. Moreover, applicants now could conduct a mutual understanding with interviewers on the spot or online. Through effective communication, they could not only better express themselves to acquire satisfied occupations but also have a comprehensive realization of the enterprise. For instance, the universities would hold numerous recruitment fairs to offer an acceptable platform for graduates to find jobs. It is an appropriate occasion for students to talk with bosses of companies face to face, thus graduates could sign the employment agreement with the desired firms faster. Hence, modern world offers more possibilities for people to get pleasing occupations by directly talking with others.
Lastly, the society in the past was pretty turbulent and citizens' life was extremely difficult. In this case, they did not have extra money or good connections to assistance them to find promising professions that would pay a lot of salaries and maintain a stable standard of living. From what was discussed above, previous eras did not supply expedience so that residents could obtain an affluent subsistence through work.
To sum up, from what has been discussed above, the present age make it more convenient for people to distinguish what kind of profession would give rise to a glorious future than in the previous time since the whole community provides more efficient approaches for the applicants such as acquire information as well as conversation with administrators.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 401, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...world and what kind of profession would be promising around the markets in the future. Under...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, lastly, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in contrast, kind of, such as, as well as, to begin with, to sum up, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 82.0 52.1666666667 157% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2771.0 1977.66487455 140% => OK
No of words: 517.0 407.700716846 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35976789168 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76839952204 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9798535875 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 281.0 212.727598566 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543520309478 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 864.0 618.680645161 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.685031849 48.9658058833 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.954545455 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36363636364 5.45110844103 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17721800744 0.236089414692 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516689644788 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0319066532151 0.0737576698707 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10413820718 0.150856017488 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319238724587 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.01818996416 118% => OK
difficult_words: 154.0 86.8835125448 177% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.