Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
“People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.”
Flower and barb exist in the same place. In effect, it is a hard nut to crack to unearth the exact solution of the above statement as it is like a coin that has two different sides which is why; people should weigh the pros and cons before jumping to conclusions. After all, each and every question or topic requires careful deliberation in that there are always multiple variables to the truth. If we ponder, we easily discern that people are undoubtedly fascinated of traveling. According to my notion, I perceive that enjoyment multiplies when we tread our legs in the foreign countries. Besides I believe that traveling outside has a legions positive effect to anyone. That’s why; I wholeheartedly opine in the positive notion to the second part of the statement and will substantiate it by dint of upholding proper logic.
To embark on, traveling abroad gives people the chance to learn a new language. Also, we can learn more about other cultures. To illustrate more, I will mention my own story. About ten years ago, I was a university student, the university nominated me to travel to Germany to assist in some medical research. The program was for two years. After arriving there, I noticed that 99 % of people there speak the German language only. I went to a close school to start German language courses. It was so easy to learn this language. I mastered it in just 6 months. A few months later, I knew more and more about their culture. That was a great experience for me. If I had not the chance to travel, I would not do this.
Furthermore, traveling to another country makes people independent and self-confident. Being surrounded by people who speak a different language and have different customs, requires people to do more effort to adapt themselves to these societies. For instance, my brother's experience is a compelling example of this. He went to the USA two years ago to study, He had no idea about the culture there, and, his English was not good. Moreover, He had to work to cover his expenses. Working with people with different languages and customs made him confident and more independent than when he was in our country.
Last but not least, traveling outside the country mean to conquest the overall aspects of that country. What I mean by this is that when we wander to any country, we can’t help but attaining a lot of positive purview which is beneficiary to our lives. Eventually in the long run, it goes to the direction of positivity. For example, my father went to Turkey when he was in the foreign minister of Bangladesh. At that moment no sooner he had trodden his legs into the ground of Turkey than he started a new horizon of life. From the very first of 23 days, he was to be familiar to local governmental area, transportation system, tourist natural places, going to the historical places. As a result, his duty to survey the whole country was not a trifling matter. Moreover, when he observed the natural beauty of Shutter stock waterfall, his mind dazzles and he depicted that beauty of it is quite reverse of our country. Certainly, the system of attracting people, the path of going to that place, the trench surrounding that area was engrossing. My father more often than not expounded the beauty of turkey like he has fallen in love of Turkey. No doubt it is own emotion and full satisfaction to rediscover him via a country visit.
To wrap it up, yes, it is virtually hard to provide a completely satisfying answer to an open-ended question. But it is lucid to understand my purview that travelling to different countries make us more culture oriented, global people and aware of the beauty of landscape more which is improbable in only of travelling own country. No matter where we are and what we do, it is upheld as a hoax to imagine beauty of only one country but in the longer version, obviously travelling others works as a diverse nature in swaying our psychology.
- Teacher should not go to television program 3
- While giving a feedback, positive comments should be given first or negative comments. 70
- While giving a feedback positive comments should be given first or negative comments 85
- Salty land is going to be erected. So we build up some solution. But proper logic will remove solution as it is unrealsitic 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: “It is more important for students to study art and literature than it is to study math and science.” Provide reasons and examples to support your opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 592, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Besides,
...read our legs in the foreign countries. Besides I believe that traveling outside has a ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 637, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a legion' or simply 'legions'?
Suggestion: a legion; legions
...es I believe that traveling outside has a legions positive effect to anyone. That's ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1238, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to rediscover him via a country visit. To wrap it up, yes, it is virtually hard...
^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 516, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ling others works as a diverse nature in swaying our psychology.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, so, after all, as for, as to, for example, for instance, i mean, no doubt, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 24.0 11.0286738351 218% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 85.0 43.0788530466 197% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 103.0 52.1666666667 197% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3265.0 1977.66487455 165% => OK
No of words: 690.0 407.700716846 169% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73188405797 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.12521717326 4.48103885553 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72622601801 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 347.0 212.727598566 163% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502898550725 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 1031.4 618.680645161 167% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 28.0 9.59856630824 292% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 39.0 20.6003584229 189% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.9164919439 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.7179487179 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6923076923 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.79487179487 5.45110844103 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 11.8709677419 168% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 4.88709677419 286% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205747424513 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0429094141767 0.076458572812 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0421608150546 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115532307693 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0252010813603 0.0645574589148 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 173.0 86.8835125448 199% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.