Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nobody can deny that the advent of computers has influenced people's lives. Children are no exception to this phenomenon. In this regard, individuals, especially parents, have to deliberate on using computers by children much more meticulously. Some people believe that taking up the children's time, playing computer games should be banned; however, the others disagree. I am in agreement with the former group. My justifications for this are as follows:
The first and paramount reason is that computer games prevent children from learning practical skills. They take up the time that children can dedicate to gaining knowledge and expertise that are essential factors to be flourished in the modern world. The more time they spend playing the games, the more tendency they will have to continue those games. My brother experience demonstrates this reality. When he was a high school student, he played an online game that had approximately twenty levels. The complexity of the game increased throughout the levels. It is obvious that he had to spend much more time to finish the higher levels. On the other hand, his classmates utilized that time to learn the Spanish language. After graduation, he applied for a medicine company in The U.S. Not meeting the language requirement of the company, he was rejected. Had he spent his time learning a foreign language, he would have had a decent job.
Moreover, playing a computer game has a negative effect on children's mental and physical health. It requires children to sit on a spot for a long time. They do not participate in physical activities that promote their health condition. Furthermore, playing computer games lead children to be isolated. They do not spend time in the company of their friends and family members, which can help enhance their social bonding, relief from the stress and boredom. If they spent less time playing games, they would be able to interact with their counterparts and other people. Communication with others gives them an opportunity to experience a healthier life. As a result, there should be imposed a limitation on spending time on playing computer games.
It might be said that there are some positives in playing computer games, most notably the time that parents can have to pursue their personal interests when children are playing games, and it can be considered as an entertainment. Despite this, for many parents, this pleasure is outweighed by issues which can prevent their children from achieving new skills and jeopardize their health.
In conclusion, considering the foregoing points and examples, I firmly agree that children should preclude from playing computer games. Not only can it deviate children from acquiring useful skills, but it can threaten their health.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer? 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 39
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment-doing things they like to do rather than doing things they should do. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 454, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... justifications for this are as follows: The first and paramount reason is that c...
^^^^
Line 5, column 233, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ills, but it can threaten their health.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2328.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 448.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19642857143 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74204191173 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502232142857 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 703.8 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.3016796211 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.2222222222 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5925925926 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.59259259259 5.45110844103 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288988956184 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0890291145902 0.076458572812 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0748341664871 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179705504967 0.150856017488 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554533367331 0.0645574589148 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 86.8835125448 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.