Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Reading paper materials is better than watching electronic devices to gain information.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is critically important that we take wise decisions today in order to secure the future of tomorrow. I believe it is better to learn and consume information through electonic devices instead of paper.I would advocate the wide-spread usage to technology over paper, for these reasons.
Firstly, paper is obtained from the latex-extacted from trees and such prevailing usage leads to deforrestation. We must discourage the usage of paper for printing information, as other alternatives are easily available and are much better for environment. A recent research study estimated that if one primary school supplants paper for computers, this would help save 1000 trees. Just imagine saving these many trees through such a novel small step. Hence, we must reduce the usage for paper for mainting the ecological balance of our environment.
Furthermore, electronic devices such as computers, phone, tabs are ubiquitous. We live in the 21st century where these devices have become pervasive, all thanks to ever chaning technology and its' advancements. This makes them very accessible to all facades of society. For instance, the recent UN "Education for all" which aims to provide quality education to the children in Northern Africa encompasses the use of computers, distributed to kids. These devices are much robust and convinent method for education than paper, especially, in region which are deprived to financial resources. Such use of electronic devices not only affects environment, but also has potential to develop socities.
Finally, electronic devices have no dimensional constraints like paper. They are capabale to transform information in more than the traditional 2D planes of paper. We can view and consume information in various forms such as audio and video. It is aided teachers across the world to explain complex concepts effectively using slides and 3D models. Take for example, a student views the 3D model of solar system and another one reading the information from paper. It is highly likely that the latter kid has comprehended the relative location of the various planets. On the other had, the first kid is in better postion as he has had a visual experience of the same.
In sum, I advocate the replacement of paper with elctronic device wherever possible. Such small steps taken in personal capacity might encourage others too and as we know ocean is made drop by drop. This has a potential to save Earth from hazards of deforrestation, global warming and climate change.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 204, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: I
...ough electonic devices instead of paper.I would advocate the wide-spread usage to...
^
Line 3, column 318, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...udy estimated that if one primary school supplants paper for computers, this woul...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, so, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2123.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 401.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29426433915 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9161408511 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583541147132 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 686.7 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.8514391777 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.3043478261 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4347826087 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.26086956522 5.45110844103 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157171332239 0.236089414692 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0474370136824 0.076458572812 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0432125132759 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0894235288565 0.150856017488 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352021427338 0.0645574589148 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 86.8835125448 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.