It is clerly understood that in such a sophisticated wourld, societies expect to everyone, espeasially younger people play they rules effectivly, so society can move in improvment diraction, because the sucsses of every societies depend on their people, and in this way younger people play a key rule. Some people have inclined toward the opinion that this rules that are requaird for young people are too strict, where as others hold exactly the opposite perspective. As far as I am concerned, the rules that society expect young people follow are strict and they should change it effectivly. In the subsequent paragraphs, I will delve into the most outstanding reasons.
The first significant piont to be mentioned is that with develop of technology and the internat almost every thing get change and society should accsept this development and move with it. In the modern wourd young people do not like to live like their parents and they do not obey every rules blindly, they want to understand they role in their society and be invole in it, so the government should make some changes in ruls, and make them more flexible for young people. For instance, the government can ask young people opinion about some rules and see the world with they eyes, this way can be very effective to make young people follow the rules that they like it. Take my personal experience as a compelling example; when I was in high school are school want us to obey some strict and old rules, but the rules were onecspectible for us, so students commeti made a suggestion to schools change the rules in a good way, at the beginning they did not accsept our proposal, but by passaged time they think about benefits of our proposal and made some changes in rules, the result of that change was unbelieveable, students followed the rules and obey them because, they thought they nade that rules by themselfe.
Anoter reason, which should be taken into consideration, is that societies need their young people more than anything because the future of every country belong to their younger people, so the changes should happen in the rules and they should be more felexible. In addition, when society do not take attentione to the wourld changes they can not improve, and situasion get worst. Fpr example my country manage by some old fashion manager, so they do not like make change in their rules, at the result young people of our society do not folloew the rules and they want make some big changes in whole country, but if the government try to chsnged the rules and made connected with young poeple, non of this accident need to happaned.
In couclusion, if one weighs the merits and demerits of the aforementioned statement, one soon realizes that every society should make their rules more felexible for younger people, and they should remember the future of every society depend on their future generation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 129, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'rule'
Suggestion: rule
...e, espeasially younger people play they rules effectivly, so society can move in impr...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 415, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...quaird for young people are too strict, where as others hold exactly the opposite perspe...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 575, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'eye'
Suggestion: eye
... some rules and see the world with they eyes, this way can be very effective to make...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2401.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 495.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85050505051 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71684168287 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50053356208 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.426262626263 0.524837075471 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 750.6 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 41.0 20.1344086022 204% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 121.660616288 48.9658058833 248% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 200.083333333 100.406767564 199% => OK
Words per sentence: 41.25 20.6045352989 200% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.45110844103 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23314386227 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111399193214 0.076458572812 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0666493129763 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157204936088 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0637221823411 0.0645574589148 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.0 11.7677419355 187% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.32 58.1214874552 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 10.1575268817 178% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.74 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.4 10.0537634409 183% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.