Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The rules that the whole society today expect young people to follow are too strict.
Since time immemorial, youngsters' behaviors have played a prominent role in each society. Governments are in quest of setting the stage for youngster's prosperity. A controversial question which is often raised regarding this idea is whether today's societies' rules are too strict for young people or not. From my perspective, nowadays, countries' legitimations, getting easier for young people. In the following paragraphs, I will substantiate my viewpoint.
The first vital point to bear in mind is that in the modern era, by the development of technology at a galloping rate and access to a variety of free and unlimited information, which have resulted in broadening people's awareness, authorities are failed to control people lives strictly. People, especially adolescents, cultivate their social knowledge through vast sources of information, for instance, internet, social media, news, and so forth. Therefore, they are conscious of their absolute rights, and they do not let anyone take them from them. Thanks to social media, they can hold protest against any rule that they consider unfair, in a blink of an eye, by which they gather in groups of thousands of people by which government will be dreadful. Since, to cease ensuing chaos, governments observe their functions and is cautious about the rules that adopt for the young generation.
The second noteworthy reason is that nowadays, with the burgeoning rate of the elderly, societies' leaders are more inclined to satisfy the young generation. In other words, community counts on them due to their essential role in building up a better society, and the society counts on them in an excessive amount. The youngsters are the precious potential for social development. Rarely, do authorities take measures, which are not in favor of young people. As a result, they would not impose strict rules on their lives because they are aware that these actions will bring about dissatisfaction between the generation that is said to be an invaluable treasure to society. Besides, today, people can more easily immigrate to other countries, so if they find their current habitat's occasion, unfavorable, they will go beyond seas to find a niche and foster.
To wrap it up, according to the aforementioned grounds, one can draw a conclusion that due to benefits for both society and adolescents, societies' authorities adopt less strict rules today. First, today's youngsters are more aware of their rights. Second, societies count on the young generation to build the future up.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-12-30 | saeide | 86 | view |
2019-05-17 | sbandjohn | 86 | view |
2019-02-08 | aliasghar | 76 | view |
2018-06-02 | amirbahman | 90 | view |
2018-01-31 | jaberabbaszadeh | 70 | view |
- Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement.Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave. 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- TPO-49 - Integrated Writing Task 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 381, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[1]
Message: The adverb 'Rarely' is usually not used at the beginning of a sentence.
...cious potential for social development. Rarely, do authorities take measures, which ar...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, regarding, second, so, therefore, as to, for instance, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2132.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 403.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29032258065 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90359693074 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553349875931 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 645.3 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.1632646194 48.9658058833 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.210526316 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2105263158 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36842105263 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1934269388 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591688758722 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561764627902 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130325702104 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420368678397 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.