Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Scientific discoveries should be shared around the world. Government should not keep it privately.
Newadays, the science is developing in an astonishingly rapid speed. What confused people for years might be solved overnight, and today's most prevailing theory may be ruled out in a few years. The governmnets of the countries, as the force of administration, sometime are critized to play too conserved roles in the process. Many famous scientists advocate that the government should keep an open mind on the new findings. Personally speaking, I partially agree with this.
First of all, the government should allow the ideas and theories in fundimantal areas, like mathematics and physics. In these field, the problems are usually narratived in a sample way, but the solution usually requires elaborated work of many people. Generally, these can be the key to the next era of human. For example, the development of quantum physics is the result of hard work by many scientists from different regions and countries. If the countries forbidded them to collabrate, this subject would never become so advanced and useful.
However, the countries should keep their technology on the military as a secret. For one thing, this is for the sake of nation security. If these technology is utilized by the evil, for instance, terroeist, the consequence should be unacceptable. For the other thing, this is also a requirement by the United Nation. The exposure of the advanced weapons and instruments will affect the balance of geographical politics, and even cause heavy tormoil among the countries. For example, the nuclear weapons, including the production of radioacitve compounds, are tightly constrained around the world. Only all the counteries completely enforce the restriction, can we escape from the fear of nuclear war.
Admittedly, some basic research may have indirect connection with the military ones. Such ambiguity leads to a embrarassing condition in the scientific circle. Scholars who will not threaten the safety are stopped due to certain actions or laws, while some weapons with the most advanced technology are sold worldwide. Nevertheless, the best solution to this is make a clear boundary by setting a blacklist.
Given all these above, I think the governments should encourage the international scientific exchange, but they should also keep an eye on the military ones from ruin our precious peace.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 169, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a sample way" with adverb for "sample"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ld, the problems are usually narratived in a sample way, but the solution usually requires elab...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 220, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "requires elaborated" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'elaborating' or 'to be elaborated'.
Suggestion: elaborating; to be elaborated
... way, but the solution usually requires elaborated work of many people. Generally, these c...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this technology' or 'these technologies'?
Suggestion: this technology; these technologies
... is for the sake of nation security. If these technology is utilized by the evil, for instance, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 109, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... military ones. Such ambiguity leads to a embrarassing condition in the scientifi...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, while, for example, for instance, i think, first of all, for one thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.0286738351 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 43.0788530466 39% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1954.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 369.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29539295393 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95556753273 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60162601626 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 600.3 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.4810215828 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.8181818182 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7727272727 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63636363636 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192652429641 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0486681153965 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573815728533 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106554564971 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496300587154 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 86.8835125448 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.