Do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
Scientific discoveries should be shared globally, and the government should not keep them as secrets. Use specific details and examples to support your answer..
Thanks to appearance of science and technology, an increasing number of people have enjoyed a comfortable lifestyle. Nowadays, some claim that all kinds of scientific discoveries should be equally accessed to all the people around the world. However, I hold an opposite opinion towards such statement. Since scientific discoveries have various kinds and classes, we are supposed to have different strategies when facing different situations.
No one can deny the fact that keeping the scientific discoveries linked to military purpose as the secret with the highest level is always been placed in the first place for every government. Peace is an indispensable part of our society, and keeping the military technology as secrets is the one way that builds the balance among the super powers around the globe, like the USA, Russia and China, to avoid some necessary conflicts, which sometimes could lead to a destructive consequence. In addition, if technology of this kind is shared globally, the terrorism could have much more opportunities to master these skills and produce mass destructive weapons. Under this circumstance, it would become extremely difficult or even impossible for any country in the world to protect their citizens' lives and property. So, when it comes to military technology, this knowledge should never be shared.
As for other kinds of discoveries, which make significant contributions to humans, they are definitely supposed to be shared without any kinds of blocks. As we all know, advances in medical technology have enabled us to live longer than before. The inventions of antibiotics and vaccines have saved millions of lives. The breakthroughs related to agriculture industry protect most people from starvation. All these achievements attribute to the shearing advanced discoveries. However, there are still many others problems unsolved, like energy shortages, global warming, or environmental pollution. These problems, which have threatened to end people's lives on our planet, could only be solved by joint efforts around the world, and scientific achievements associated with these challenges should be equally accessed.
From what I have mentioned above, when it comes to the knowledge sharing, we can never always value the one strategy more than the other. It is necessary to do a clear judgment and choice the most suitable choice.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-20 | Rustin_Panda | 76 | view |
- In the past people were more friendly than they are today Do you agree or disagree with the statement 76
- Agree or disagree: It is as important for old people to study and learn new things as it is for young people. 85
- Agree or disagree: In order to success in study or job，the ability to adapt or adjust to a changing condition or circumstance is more important than having excellent knowledge of a job or in a field of study. 66
- When doing group projects, some people are allowed to choose anyone they wish for; others are allowed to choose those who think differently from them. Which do you think is more effective? 70
- Some university teachers prefer to record their lectures before classes In this way students will be familiar with the lecture in advance and teachers help students practice in classes while they are watching or listening lectures Do you think it is an ef 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, still, as for, in addition, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2009.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 369.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44444444444 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93472286956 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588075880759 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 634.5 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.3782601444 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.611111111 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.16666666667 5.45110844103 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129600291062 0.236089414692 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0366597324912 0.076458572812 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430533889843 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0739357352911 0.150856017488 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333585559332 0.0645574589148 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 10.9000537634 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.